Maurice Jones-Drew 2012 Season Outlook
#1
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:18 AM
There is now news of him threatening to hold out into camp for a new deal due to the fact that he seems vastly underpaid as the NFLs leading rusher and 150% of the Jaguar's offense (not statistically accurate). Before the latest news, I had him pegged as a top 6 pick. What say you?
#2
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:35 AM
I think the Jags offense is switching a new direction, I'm not saying it will be good but seemingly they want to pass more and be less reliant on the run. I think it's stupid for them not to sign MJD as he is one of the most reliable players in the league no matter the wear and tear. He's in great physical condition. He looks like a straight bodybuilder.
I think he will eventually sign after he starts getting fined a bit for not showing up. He is one of the few players that doesn't need to show up to camp to be effective, even with a new offense I think he will be fine. Still like him as a mid-1st round pick in that 5-7 range.
H,2B,HR,RBI,R,SB,TB,AVG,K,BB | QS,W,L,K,ERA,WHIP,S,CG,SO,HRA
C:Willin Rosario
1B: Allen Craig
2B: Josh Rutledge
3B: Miguel Cabrera
SS: Alcides Escobar
IF: Jean Segura
OF: Desmond Jennings, Bryce Harper, Jose Bautista, Alex Gordon, Norichika Aoki
Util: Travis Hafner
Bench: Vernon Wells, Andrelton Simmons, Starling Marte
DL: Aaron Hill
SP: Justin Verlander, David Price, Matt Moore, Matt Harvey, Hisashi Iwakuma
RP: Greg Holland Glen Perkins
P: Brandon League, Justin Masterson
Bench: Ross Detweiler
DL: Brandon Beachy
#3
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:08 AM
1. His knees are a ticking time bomb. At least one is bone on bone, sorry but I don't care how good you are, having a meniscus in the NFL is kinda a necessity at some point.
2. Horrible offense. I know I know, he defied the odds last year but can he really keep up that insane yards after contact average?
QB: C. Newton
RB: R. Rice
RB: R. Bush
WR: B. Marshall
WR: M. Austin
Flex: M. Crabtree
TE: K. Rudolph
K: M. Bryant
Def: Green Bay
Bench: B. Lloyd, BJGE, J. Finley, D. Bess, D. Thomas, B. Pierce
Record: 7-6 ; 3rd Place Championship Bracket
#4
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:38 AM
Nice thread to start, weird he didn't have one already.
rraayy3, on 20 August 2012 - 11:16 AM, said:
get sunday ticket, think for yourself.
#5
Posted 05 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
#7
Posted 05 July 2012 - 02:00 PM
Basically, he fits in the picks 6-10 range, if you have faith, which I do.
Looking at ADP right now, he is behind Mathews and CJ.
Edited by Go Big Blue, 05 July 2012 - 02:00 PM.
#8
Posted 07 July 2012 - 01:14 PM
Edited by RMJ_12, 07 July 2012 - 01:15 PM.
#9
Posted 07 July 2012 - 01:15 PM
Panthor, on 05 July 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
#10
Posted 07 July 2012 - 03:48 PM
#11
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:10 PM
RMJ_12, on 07 July 2012 - 01:15 PM, said:
Panthor, on 05 July 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
whether he started or not is irrelevant. all being a "starter" means is that you're the first one of the field. what matters is the workload you have in each game and in each season. his 1400+ carries and 1700+ touches in 6 seasons is a "starters" workload. DeAngelo Williams has been the "starter" in Carolina and he isn't even near MJD's workload. and don't forget about Joseph Addai. both "starters" and neither one even close to the amount of work MJD has seen
and as for not breaking down by age 27, why don't you tell that to Addai and Williams too. both of them broke down at age 27, with significantly less mileage on their legs.
and then there is Michael Turner, 382 touches, a rushing title and the next year he didn't get to 900 yards or 200 touches. and this was a guy who had almost no mileage on his legs, who got to sit on the bench and only came into a game because LT needed to take a break for a minute
and your notion that RBs always go downhill after 30, don't say that in front of Thomas Jones who had his best years after he turned 30.
there is no absolute rule or guideline you can use when trying to figure out if a player is going to break down. and i for one don't think MJD will break down this year but you are delusional if you think it is a lock he is going to have another 300+ touch season in 2012
#12
Posted 13 July 2012 - 10:24 AM
Panthor, on 09 July 2012 - 12:10 PM, said:
RMJ_12, on 07 July 2012 - 01:15 PM, said:
Panthor, on 05 July 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
whether he started or not is irrelevant. all being a "starter" means is that you're the first one of the field. what matters is the workload you have in each game and in each season. his 1400+ carries and 1700+ touches in 6 seasons is a "starters" workload. DeAngelo Williams has been the "starter" in Carolina and he isn't even near MJD's workload. and don't forget about Joseph Addai. both "starters" and neither one even close to the amount of work MJD has seen
and as for not breaking down by age 27, why don't you tell that to Addai and Williams too. both of them broke down at age 27, with significantly less mileage on their legs.
and then there is Michael Turner, 382 touches, a rushing title and the next year he didn't get to 900 yards or 200 touches. and this was a guy who had almost no mileage on his legs, who got to sit on the bench and only came into a game because LT needed to take a break for a minute
and your notion that RBs always go downhill after 30, don't say that in front of Thomas Jones who had his best years after he turned 30.
there is no absolute rule or guideline you can use when trying to figure out if a player is going to break down. and i for one don't think MJD will break down this year but you are delusional if you think it is a lock he is going to have another 300+ touch season in 2012
#13
Posted 13 July 2012 - 11:36 AM
RMJ_12, on 13 July 2012 - 10:24 AM, said:
Panthor, on 09 July 2012 - 12:10 PM, said:
RMJ_12, on 07 July 2012 - 01:15 PM, said:
Panthor, on 05 July 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
whether he started or not is irrelevant. all being a "starter" means is that you're the first one of the field. what matters is the workload you have in each game and in each season. his 1400+ carries and 1700+ touches in 6 seasons is a "starters" workload. DeAngelo Williams has been the "starter" in Carolina and he isn't even near MJD's workload. and don't forget about Joseph Addai. both "starters" and neither one even close to the amount of work MJD has seen
and as for not breaking down by age 27, why don't you tell that to Addai and Williams too. both of them broke down at age 27, with significantly less mileage on their legs.
and then there is Michael Turner, 382 touches, a rushing title and the next year he didn't get to 900 yards or 200 touches. and this was a guy who had almost no mileage on his legs, who got to sit on the bench and only came into a game because LT needed to take a break for a minute
and your notion that RBs always go downhill after 30, don't say that in front of Thomas Jones who had his best years after he turned 30.
there is no absolute rule or guideline you can use when trying to figure out if a player is going to break down. and i for one don't think MJD will break down this year but you are delusional if you think it is a lock he is going to have another 300+ touch season in 2012
getting injured every year would mean you're breaking down.
so you'll use workload when it suits your argument but will discount it when it contradicts it.
Quote
#14
Posted 13 July 2012 - 11:41 AM
RMJ_12, on 13 July 2012 - 10:24 AM, said:
Panthor, on 09 July 2012 - 12:10 PM, said:
RMJ_12, on 07 July 2012 - 01:15 PM, said:
Panthor, on 05 July 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
whether he started or not is irrelevant. all being a "starter" means is that you're the first one of the field. what matters is the workload you have in each game and in each season. his 1400+ carries and 1700+ touches in 6 seasons is a "starters" workload. DeAngelo Williams has been the "starter" in Carolina and he isn't even near MJD's workload. and don't forget about Joseph Addai. both "starters" and neither one even close to the amount of work MJD has seen
and as for not breaking down by age 27, why don't you tell that to Addai and Williams too. both of them broke down at age 27, with significantly less mileage on their legs.
and then there is Michael Turner, 382 touches, a rushing title and the next year he didn't get to 900 yards or 200 touches. and this was a guy who had almost no mileage on his legs, who got to sit on the bench and only came into a game because LT needed to take a break for a minute
and your notion that RBs always go downhill after 30, don't say that in front of Thomas Jones who had his best years after he turned 30.
there is no absolute rule or guideline you can use when trying to figure out if a player is going to break down. and i for one don't think MJD will break down this year but you are delusional if you think it is a lock he is going to have another 300+ touch season in 2012
Seriously though what is your definition of breaking down?
My Roster
PG --- Chris Paul (LAC) === [3rd Overall]
PF/C --- Serge Ibaka (OKC) === [27th Overall]
PF/C --- Anthony Davis (NO) === [46th Overall]
PF --- Dirk Nowitzki (DAL) === [22nd]
PF/C --- Kevin Garnett (BOS) === [51st]
PG --- Goran Dragic (PHX) === [48th / Trade]
SG/SF --- Klay Thompson (GS) === [70th]
SG/SF --- Aaron Afflalo (ORL) === [94th]
PG/SG --- Jamal Crawford (LAC) === [FA]
SF/PF --- Earl Clark (LAL) === [FA]
C --- Tiago Splitter (SA) === [FA]
PG/SG --- Erics Bledsoe (LAC) === [FA]
Originally Drafted But No Longer On Team
C - Brook Lopez (BKN) = [75th] , SG - O.J. Mayo (DAL) = [99th] , PG - Jameer Nelson (ORL) = [118th] , PG/SG - Greivis Vasquez (NO) = [123rd]
#15
Posted 13 July 2012 - 11:42 AM
If I was a pro for MJD I think you could argue how he's built ect... to last a while. A few backs can do it. Although, the Turner comparison was a good one. Why risk your season on MJD? Where you would take him, you would be passing up on a rejuvenated CJ2K? I couldn't make that move. I'd take Lynch over MJD too.
Every couple years the big rusher changes, and too many of us GM's take the guy after the big season and not prior.
#16
Posted 13 July 2012 - 11:54 AM
~1600 total yards, 7 TDs
~1800 total yards, 16 TDs
that is his last 3 years of production, and he split carries his first few years so age is irrelevant and he's been a stud every year despite the same bs knocks every year
assuming he is in camp on time, you are an idiot if you pass on him.
#17
Posted 13 July 2012 - 01:50 PM
MJD has proven he can carry the load, although small and although on a crap team. That's incredible. Period. He probably deservers a first round pick for this reason alone. And 27 is NOT old no matter how you look at it.
I don't doubt his skill or even his health. His holdout is just making me nervous. We've seen the MOST TALENTED backs have an off year because of contract disputes causing no time maintain their gel with the team in the offseason. He's causing his offense to take a different direction. And this looks like the contract dispute making the least amount of progress. If he's not suiting up at training camp, and gets his contract days before the regular season etc, then I'm not touching him. I'm taking CJ1K over MJD right now unless his contract gets sorted out.
All that said, MJD could get his contract days before the reg season, and could still have the exact same role as bellcow of the entire offense, but you'd be dumb to say there's not risk there though if that happens. Too much risk for me.
However, if both sides negotiated a contract today, I'd be all over MJD in the 2nd half of the first round. He's that good. That would make him and CJ1K a coin flip for me.
#18
Posted 13 July 2012 - 02:10 PM
But I can't stop thinking about last year's thread.
It was even darker than this one, because he was fresh off of surgery.
Then he stomped a**.
RB: Lawrence Phillips
RB: Ki-Jana Carter
WR: Charles Rogers
WR: Desmond Howard
TE: David LaFleur
W/R: Darren McFadden
K: Ray Finkle(Einhorn)
D: Saints
BN: Andre Ware/Tony Mandarich/Curtis Enis/Travis Henry/Brian Bosworth/Assy Ice
#19
Posted 13 July 2012 - 03:07 PM
You just dont want to be that guy that drafts mjd the year he breaks down.
#20
Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:12 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













