Jump to content

Visit Rotoworld.comRotoworld Forums  
Rotoworld: MLB | NFL | NBA | NHL | NASCAR | CFB
Sports Talk Blogs: PFT | HBT | PBT | CFT | PHT
  Visit NBCSports.com

Photo

Should this trade get Vetoed?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic

#1 JEREMY LIN

JEREMY LIN

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 417 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:01 AM

Team A gets: Michael Vick, Ben Tate, Pierre Garcon

Team B gets: Arian Foster, Eric Decker, Eli Manning


To me this trade is unfair for Team A but some of the owners are disagreeing. What do you guys think?

Edited by JEREMY LIN, 17 September 2013 - 01:10 AM.

10 team 1/2 point ppr

My team:

QB: Jay Cutler
RB1: LeSean McCoy
RB2: Mark Ingram
WR1: Emmanuel Sanders
WR2: Alshon Jeffery
WR3: Mike Evans
TE: Dwayne Allen
Flex: Lamar Miller 
Def: Lions
K: Parkey

Bench: Isaiah Crowell, Julian Edelman, Cam Newton, Dolphins D


#2 tronimrich

tronimrich

    Triple-A

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:04 AM

At the moment this is an unbalanced trade. Team A is getting shafted. This is three sell low guys being traded for three sell high guys. Terrible.

Please help me decide 2 of 4: http://forums.rotowo...howtopic=370597

Edited by tronimrich, 17 September 2013 - 01:04 AM.


#3 The Mechanic

The Mechanic

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Vick > Eli
Tate << Foster
Garcon > Decker

Vick will be one of the highest scoring QBs in that offense if he can stay healthy. I like Garcon over Decker. Garcon is the #1 guy while Decker is #3 or #4. Foster is obviously more valuable than Tate. It's not veto worthy but it's not a trade I would do.

#4 needlineups43

needlineups43

    Superstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,208 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Not seeing the issue.. Who knows if Tate could overtake Foster at some point with his injury/production issues. Vick is an upgrade over Manning. I've been trying to trade for Vick and I own manning. Garcon is on fire in a pass happy offense.
Other Way: Foster could step up his game and be an animal the rest of the way, Decker has a Hall of Fame QB throwing to him and is productive.. Manning, albeit inconsistent can put up serious numbers. Not a great deal, but far from veto worthy.

#5 Boshiaw

Boshiaw

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 345 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

I mean if both teams know their fantasy football and agree on it and it isn't collusion. I don't think it is lopsided enough to veto. No one likes to tell owners how to run their own team.

Won 12-Team League Non-PPR in 2012-2013 season

12-Team League. Half-Point PPR Week 5 (Update 08.30.2015)
QB: Ryan Tannelhill
RB1: Eddie Lacy
RB2: Lamar Miller
WR1: Alshon Jeffery
WR2: John Brown
TE: Greg Olsen
FLEX: Carlos Hyde
D/ST: Packers D/ST
K: Stephen Gostkowski
Bench: Ameer Abdullah, Kendall Wright, Reggie Bush, Marvin Jones, DeVante Parker, Teddy Bridgewater, Cmaeron Artis-Payne

 

 


#6 erick2008e

erick2008e

    Allstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 852 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Vick > Manning
Garcion > Decker ( Barley too many mouths to feed)
Tate < Foster but fosters workload scares me

10 Team Head to Head Auction  2 Divisions (11 x 11) After this week 4-1-1 (1st in Division, 2nd Overall)

C- No Catcher

1B- Paul Goldschmdt

2B- Josh Harrison (Also has 3B and OF ability)

3B- Josh Donaldson

SS- Marcus Semien (2B and 3B Ability)

OF- Adam Jones, Ryan Braun, Starling Marte

Utility- Nolan Arenado, Alex Gordon

SP- Danny Salazar, Collin McHugh, Shane Greene, Julio Teheran, Micheal Wacha, Gio Gonzalez, Jose Quintana, Jason Hammel 

RP- Joakim Soria, Jason Grilli, Luke Gregerson

BN- Joe Mauer, Freddy Galvis, Kole, Calhon

DL- Jean Segura, Travis d'Amaud

Trades- Received- Ryan Braun for Pujols, Martle & Wacha for Pablo Sandoval & Andrus, Adam Jones, Chris Tillman(Dropped), Taijuan Walker(Dropped) for Sale & Yelich


#7 smokin_that_greenellis

smokin_that_greenellis

    Superstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,015 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:32 AM

If 2 owners agree on a trade then it should never be vetoed. I've come to learn that in my time on these forums. Both guys obviously saw value in what they're getting, so who cares if it seems unfair to anyone else.

I don't shine shoes.  I don't tape ankles.  I don't cut checks.  Straight cash, homie.


#8 Slider

Slider

    Superstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,629 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:37 AM

I don't know. It looks okay. Basically, Vick for Foster. Decker can either be a dud or a stud. Garcon is the better WR. Tate is a backup and Eli is garbage.
12 person (2QB auction league)
QB: Eli Manning (NYG), Alex Smith (KC), Jason Campbell (Cle); Scott Tolzien (GB); Ryan Fitzpatrick (Ten)
WR: Jordy Nelson (GB), Michael Crabtree (SF), Riley Cooper (Phi); Rishard Matthews (Mia); Jericho Cotchery (Pit)

RB: Giovani Bernard (Cin), Shane Vereen (NE); Rashad Jennings (Oak)
TE: Tony Gonzalez (Atl)
K: Stephen Gostkowski
DEF: Carolina



12 person (standard league)
QB: Mike Glennon (TB); Russell Wilson (Sea)
WR: Demaryius Thomas (Den), Calvin Johnson (Det), Brandon Marshall (Chi), Keenan Allen (SD)
RB: Zac Stacy (StL), Steven Jackson (Atl), Andre Ellington (Ari), Andre Brown (NYG); Rashad Jennings (Oak)
TE: Rob Gronkowski (NE), Julius Thomas (Den)
K: Stephen Gostkowski
DEF: Houston

#9 NyjersInParis

NyjersInParis

    Hall of Famer

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,797 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:54 AM

If vick is healthy he'll be a qb1. I wouldnt veto it. If at the end of the season vick is the top scoring qb and foster is injured and tate puts up rb1 numbers what will you tell team 1? Last season a trade was vetoed in my league. Mccoy for spiller and morris after week 1. Everyone said the team giving up mccoy was being ripped off, but if the trade went though he would of won the league getting two rb1's.
Team 1 10 Team Standardqb Bridgewater rb D. Murray AP wr Matthews Cooks Te Thomas Flex Adams D/st miami
Bn qb Brady rb Foster Bernard wr Watkins wr Allen
Team 2 12 Team .5 PPR<p>qb rodgers rb ivory Gordon wr Cobb Adams Landry flex Edelman te eifert d/st colts
Bn rb bell yeldon Coleman Sankey woodhead spiller wr c. Johnson

#10 bwells

bwells

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 102 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 04:59 AM

IMO Trades should only be vetoed if there is high suspect/evidence of collusion.
$20 buy in, ESPN 12 Team Standard: (QB 1, RB 2, WR 2, TE 1, FLEX 1, D/ST 1,K 1, BENCH 7)
Record: 4-0

QB: Stafford,
RB: Peterson, A. Morris, Sproles, S. Jax, B. Tate, Vereen
WR: Dez, L. Fitz, R. White, Josh Gordon, P. Harven
TE: Graham
K: Novak
D/ST: Bills, Cowboys

#11 Guile

Guile

    Allstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 781 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 05:26 AM

I agree with Bwells, as a commissioner in my league, I dont think I've ever vetoed a trade. The only reason I would, is if it there were obvious signs of collusion. You have to remember, in a competitive league, NO ONE likes seeing teams improve and it's in ur interest to vote down a trade or veto it. Seems to me like both these guys are trying to improve their teams, although the trade is loopsided.

Edited by Guile, 17 September 2013 - 05:27 AM.