Jump to content

Visit Rotoworld.comRotoworld Forums  
Rotoworld: MLB | NFL | NBA | NHL | NASCAR | CFB
Sports Talk Blogs: PFT | HBT | PBT | CFT | PHT
  Visit NBCSports.com


Should this trade get Vetoed?

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic




  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 539 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:01 AM

Team A gets: Michael Vick, Ben Tate, Pierre Garcon

Team B gets: Arian Foster, Eric Decker, Eli Manning

To me this trade is unfair for Team A but some of the owners are disagreeing. What do you guys think?

Edited by JEREMY LIN, 17 September 2013 - 01:10 AM.

#2 tronimrich



  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 70 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:04 AM

At the moment this is an unbalanced trade. Team A is getting shafted. This is three sell low guys being traded for three sell high guys. Terrible.

Please help me decide 2 of 4: http://forums.rotowo...howtopic=370597

Edited by tronimrich, 17 September 2013 - 01:04 AM.

#3 The Mechanic

The Mechanic


  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Vick > Eli
Tate << Foster
Garcon > Decker

Vick will be one of the highest scoring QBs in that offense if he can stay healthy. I like Garcon over Decker. Garcon is the #1 guy while Decker is #3 or #4. Foster is obviously more valuable than Tate. It's not veto worthy but it's not a trade I would do.

#4 needlineups43



  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,208 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Not seeing the issue.. Who knows if Tate could overtake Foster at some point with his injury/production issues. Vick is an upgrade over Manning. I've been trying to trade for Vick and I own manning. Garcon is on fire in a pass happy offense.
Other Way: Foster could step up his game and be an animal the rest of the way, Decker has a Hall of Fame QB throwing to him and is productive.. Manning, albeit inconsistent can put up serious numbers. Not a great deal, but far from veto worthy.

#5 Boshiaw



  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 347 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

I mean if both teams know their fantasy football and agree on it and it isn't collusion. I don't think it is lopsided enough to veto. No one likes to tell owners how to run their own team.

Won 12-Team League Non-PPR in 2012-2013 season

12-Team League. Half-Point PPR Week 5 (Update 08.30.2015)
QB: Ryan Tannelhill
RB1: Eddie Lacy
RB2: Lamar Miller
WR1: Odell Beckham Jr.
WR2: John Brown
TE: Greg Olsen
FLEX: Carlos Hyde
D/ST: Packers D/ST
K: Stephen Gostkowski
Bench: Ameer Abdullah, Kendall Wright, Reggie Bush, Marvin Jones, DeVante Parker, Teddy Bridgewater, Cmaeron Artis-Payne



#6 erick2008e



  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 882 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Vick > Manning
Garcion > Decker ( Barley too many mouths to feed)
Tate < Foster but fosters workload scares me

10 PPR with IDP Players  6 points per TD, 1 point per Completion 

QB- Peyton Manning,

WR- Julio, Megatron, 

RB- Jeremy Hill, Carlos Hyde

TE- Charles Clay 

W/T- Larry Fitzgerald

W/R- Freeman


K-Matt Bryant( But kickers are a crapshoot)


BN-DeSean Jackson Tevin Coleman, C.J. Spiller, Giovanni Bernard, DIon Lewis & Delanie Walker

#7 smokin_that_greenellis



  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,088 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:32 AM

If 2 owners agree on a trade then it should never be vetoed. I've come to learn that in my time on these forums. Both guys obviously saw value in what they're getting, so who cares if it seems unfair to anyone else.

it was Johnny Hopkins and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin' that ish up everyday.


Week 12 of 13 - Tied for Final Playoff Seed                                      Playoffs Round 1 - #3 Seed

12-Team 1-PPR                                                                                 20-Team 1-PPR

QB: Eli Manning -- R. Wilson                                                             QB: Josh McCown -- R. Fitzpatrick

RB: Chris Ivory                                                                                   RB: LeGarrette Blount

RB: Lamar Miller -- B. Allen, S. Draughn, S. Vereen, A. Bradshaw   RB: Shaun Draughn -- R. Hillman, M. Jones, CJ Spiller

WR: Julio Jones                                                                                 WR: Amari Cooper

WR: Antonio Brown -- D. Funchess                                                   WR: Brandin Cooks -- D. Inman

TE: Jordan Reed                                                                                TE: Greg Olsen -- Z. Miller

FLX: Michael Crabtree                                                                       FLX: Gronk

DEF: Falcons -- Texans                                                                      DEF: Falcons -- Bucs

Injured: Dion Lewis                                                                            Injured: Dion Lewis, Steve Smith Sr.  -_-

#8 Slider



  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,629 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:37 AM

I don't know. It looks okay. Basically, Vick for Foster. Decker can either be a dud or a stud. Garcon is the better WR. Tate is a backup and Eli is garbage.
12 person (2QB auction league)
QB: Eli Manning (NYG), Alex Smith (KC), Jason Campbell (Cle); Scott Tolzien (GB); Ryan Fitzpatrick (Ten)
WR: Jordy Nelson (GB), Michael Crabtree (SF), Riley Cooper (Phi); Rishard Matthews (Mia); Jericho Cotchery (Pit)

RB: Giovani Bernard (Cin), Shane Vereen (NE); Rashad Jennings (Oak)
TE: Tony Gonzalez (Atl)
K: Stephen Gostkowski
DEF: Carolina

12 person (standard league)
QB: Mike Glennon (TB); Russell Wilson (Sea)
WR: Demaryius Thomas (Den), Calvin Johnson (Det), Brandon Marshall (Chi), Keenan Allen (SD)
RB: Zac Stacy (StL), Steven Jackson (Atl), Andre Ellington (Ari), Andre Brown (NYG); Rashad Jennings (Oak)
TE: Rob Gronkowski (NE), Julius Thomas (Den)
K: Stephen Gostkowski
DEF: Houston

#9 NyjersInParis


    Hall of Famer

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,814 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:54 AM

If vick is healthy he'll be a qb1. I wouldnt veto it. If at the end of the season vick is the top scoring qb and foster is injured and tate puts up rb1 numbers what will you tell team 1? Last season a trade was vetoed in my league. Mccoy for spiller and morris after week 1. Everyone said the team giving up mccoy was being ripped off, but if the trade went though he would of won the league getting two rb1's.

Team 1 10 Team Standard
Qb Brady rb Blount AP wr J. Brown Cooks Te Walker Flex D. Murray D/st Patriots k Barth
Bench rb Hyde White wr J. Matthews 
Team 2 12 Team Standard
Qb E. Manning rb ivory lacy wr Megatron Bryant te Gronk flex J. Matthews D/st Stream k Bryant
Bench Romo rb Blue Coleman wr Lafell  Adams
Team 3 12 Team .5 PPR
Qb rodgers rb ivory Yeldon wr Cobb Diggs Landry flex Eifert te Gates d/st Bengals k McManus
Bench romo rb m. gordon white langford wr Edelman 
Team 4 10 team auction .5 ppr
Qb Newton rb l. Murray Murray wr Hopkins Evans flex Bernard te Gates  d/st stream k Bryant
Bench  rb R. Matthews wr Watkins Adams J. Matthews
Team 5 12 Team Standard
qb Brees rb AP Langford wr Green Cobb Sanders te Reed d/st Stream k Bailey
bench Bortles rb Hyde White Blue  wr Diggs te Barnidge

#10 bwells



  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 102 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 04:59 AM

IMO Trades should only be vetoed if there is high suspect/evidence of collusion.
$20 buy in, ESPN 12 Team Standard: (QB 1, RB 2, WR 2, TE 1, FLEX 1, D/ST 1,K 1, BENCH 7)
Record: 4-0

QB: Stafford,
RB: Peterson, A. Morris, Sproles, S. Jax, B. Tate, Vereen
WR: Dez, L. Fitz, R. White, Josh Gordon, P. Harven
TE: Graham
K: Novak
D/ST: Bills, Cowboys

#11 Guile



  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 785 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 05:26 AM

I agree with Bwells, as a commissioner in my league, I dont think I've ever vetoed a trade. The only reason I would, is if it there were obvious signs of collusion. You have to remember, in a competitive league, NO ONE likes seeing teams improve and it's in ur interest to vote down a trade or veto it. Seems to me like both these guys are trying to improve their teams, although the trade is loopsided.

Edited by Guile, 17 September 2013 - 05:27 AM.