Jump to content

Visit Rotoworld.comRotoworld Forums  
Rotoworld: MLB | NFL | NBA | NHL | NASCAR | CFB
Sports Talk Blogs: PFT | HBT | PBT | CFT | PHT
  Visit NBCSports.com

Should this trade get Vetoed?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 JEREMY LIN

JEREMY LIN

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 207 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:01 AM

Team A gets: Michael Vick, Ben Tate, Pierre Garcon

Team B gets: Arian Foster, Eric Decker, Eli Manning


To me this trade is unfair for Team A but some of the owners are disagreeing. What do you guys think?

Edited by JEREMY LIN, 17 September 2013 - 01:10 AM.


#2 tronimrich

tronimrich

    Triple-A

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 58 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:04 AM

At the moment this is an unbalanced trade. Team A is getting shafted. This is three sell low guys being traded for three sell high guys. Terrible.

Please help me decide 2 of 4: http://forums.rotowo...howtopic=370597

Edited by tronimrich, 17 September 2013 - 01:04 AM.

12-Team Standard 4pt PTD 6pt R/RTD
QB Matt Ryan
WR1 Victor Cruz
WR2 Marques Colston
RB1 Trent Richardson
RB2 Le'Veon Bell
TE Julius Thomas
WR/RB Antonio Brown
WR/RB Julian Edelman


Montee Ball, Owen Daniels, DeAndre Hopkins, Rashad Jennings, Percy Harvin, Kendall Hunter

#3 The Mechanic

The Mechanic

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 397 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Vick > Eli
Tate << Foster
Garcon > Decker

Vick will be one of the highest scoring QBs in that offense if he can stay healthy. I like Garcon over Decker. Garcon is the #1 guy while Decker is #3 or #4. Foster is obviously more valuable than Tate. It's not veto worthy but it's not a trade I would do.

#4 needlineups43

needlineups43

    Superstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,204 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madison WI
  • Interests:Bowling, Biking, Baseball, Football

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Not seeing the issue.. Who knows if Tate could overtake Foster at some point with his injury/production issues. Vick is an upgrade over Manning. I've been trying to trade for Vick and I own manning. Garcon is on fire in a pass happy offense.
Other Way: Foster could step up his game and be an animal the rest of the way, Decker has a Hall of Fame QB throwing to him and is productive.. Manning, albeit inconsistent can put up serious numbers. Not a great deal, but far from veto worthy.

#5 Boshiaw

Boshiaw

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

I mean if both teams know their fantasy football and agree on it and it isn't collusion. I don't think it is lopsided enough to veto. No one likes to tell owners how to run their own team.
Won 12-Team League Non-PPR in 2012-2013 season

12-Team League. Not PPR Week 1 (Update 08.20.2014)
QB: Tony Romo
RB1: Montee Ball
RB2: Toby Gerhart
WR1: Calvin Johnson
WR2: Keenan Allen
TE: Rob Gronkowski
FLEX: Bishop Sankey
D/ST: Patriots Defense
K: Phil Dawson
Bench: Shane Vereen, Jordan Reed, Lamar Miller, Bernard Pierce, Mike Evans, Ronnie Hillman, Kenny Britt

#6 erick2008e

erick2008e

    Allstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 812 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 AM

Vick > Manning
Garcion > Decker ( Barley too many mouths to feed)
Tate < Foster but fosters workload scares me
10 team( 11 x 11 league...Runs, Hits, Doubles, Triples, HR, RBI, Walks AVG, OBPS, Stolen Bases, Total Base,)
(Innings Pitched, Wins, Loses, Complete Games, Shutouts, Balls, Strikeouts, ERA, WHIP, QS & Saves)

C- Salvador Perez
1B- Billy Butler( Until Brandon Belt comes back)
2B- Daniel Murphy
3B- Josh Donaldson
SS- Starlin Castro
OF- Adam Jones
OF- Puig
OF- Ellsbury
UTL- Polanco (OF)
UTL- Dickerson (OF)
BN- Jay Bruce, Springer, Ben Zobrist
DL- Brandon Belt & WIll Myers

SP- Julio Terhan, James Shield, Tyson Ross, Ventrua,Wood, Alvarez, and Kluber
RP- Joakim Soria, Melancon, Cody Allen

#7 smokin_that_greenellis

smokin_that_greenellis

    Superstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,899 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunnyvale Trailer Park

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:32 AM

If 2 owners agree on a trade then it should never be vetoed.  I've come to learn that in my time on these forums.  Both guys obviously saw value in what they're getting, so who cares if it seems unfair to anyone else.

#8 Slider

Slider

    Superstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,629 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:37 AM

I don't know.  It looks okay.  Basically, Vick for Foster.  Decker can either be a dud or a stud.  Garcon is the better WR.  Tate is a backup and Eli is garbage.
12 person (2QB auction league)
QB: Eli Manning (NYG), Alex Smith (KC), Jason Campbell (Cle); Scott Tolzien (GB); Ryan Fitzpatrick (Ten)
WR: Jordy Nelson (GB), Michael Crabtree (SF), Riley Cooper (Phi); Rishard Matthews (Mia); Jericho Cotchery (Pit)

RB: Giovani Bernard (Cin), Shane Vereen (NE); Rashad Jennings (Oak)
TE: Tony Gonzalez (Atl)
K: Stephen Gostkowski
DEF: Carolina



12 person (standard league)
QB: Mike Glennon (TB); Russell Wilson (Sea)
WR: Demaryius Thomas (Den), Calvin Johnson (Det), Brandon Marshall (Chi), Keenan Allen (SD)
RB: Zac Stacy (StL), Steven Jackson (Atl), Andre Ellington (Ari), Andre Brown (NYG); Rashad Jennings (Oak)
TE: Rob Gronkowski (NE), Julius Thomas (Den)
K: Stephen Gostkowski
DEF: Houston

#9 NyjersInParis

NyjersInParis

    On the Ballot

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,660 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:54 AM

If vick is healthy he'll be a qb1. I wouldnt veto it. If at the end of the season vick is the top scoring qb and foster is injured and tate puts up rb1 numbers what will you tell team 1? Last season a trade was vetoed in my league. Mccoy for spiller and morris after week 1. Everyone said the team giving up mccoy was being ripped off, but if the trade went though he would of won the league getting two rb1's.
14 Team League 2 Keeper H2H
c norris 1b goldy (K) 2b cano 3b machado ss e. cabrera infield singleton
lf kemp cf mccutchen (K) rf stanton of springer util morales bn ozuna holt jennings dickerson dl arenado
sp tanaka cashner hamels ventura p fister cashner
rp kimbrel soriano ramirez belisario
bn heaney


12 team league keep 6 in the round they were drafted in
c mesorosco 1b pujols 2b carpenter (K) 3b wright ss segura (K)
lf marte (K) cf mccutchen rf puig (K) util gomez (K) pedroia bn castro hamilton chisenhall
sp cashner mejia (K)  rp romo jensen p w. davis betances hawkins belisario
bn  haren hughes cain  bailey dl cole paxton
na soler, heaney, c. seager, c. frazier

#10 bwells

bwells

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 102 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 04:59 AM

IMO Trades should only be vetoed if there is high suspect/evidence of collusion.
$20 buy in, ESPN 12 Team Standard: (QB 1, RB 2, WR 2, TE 1, FLEX 1, D/ST 1,K 1, BENCH 7)
Record: 4-0

QB: Stafford,  
RB: Peterson, A. Morris, Sproles, S. Jax, B. Tate, Vereen
WR: Dez, L. Fitz, R. White, Josh Gordon, P. Harven
TE: Graham
K: Novak
D/ST: Bills, Cowboys

#11 Guile

Guile

    Allstar

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 665 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 September 2013 - 05:26 AM

I agree with Bwells, as a commissioner in my league, I dont think I've ever vetoed a trade. The only reason I would, is if it there were obvious signs of collusion. You have to remember, in a competitive league, NO ONE likes seeing teams improve and it's in ur interest to vote down a trade or veto it. Seems to me like both these guys are trying to improve their teams, although the trade is loopsided.

Edited by Guile, 17 September 2013 - 05:27 AM.

Record: 9-2 (12 Team non-ppr; 8th pick overall, 6pt passing td/-3 int)

QB: Romo (9th Rd)

RB1 Charles (1st Rd)
RB2: **M. Lynch
FLEX: *Gio Bernard (T)

WR1: Dez (2nd)
WR2: K. Allen (W)

*TE J. Thomas (T)

Def: Seahawks
K: A. Vinatieri
Bench: *SJax, A. Dobson, Sproles, P. Harvin, N. Foles, J. Cook

*Trade 0ct 2nd: DMC/Wilson/Roddy for Gio/Sjax/J. Thomas
** Traded Nov 8th: Jordy/Gonzo/Jeffery/M. James for Lynch/J. Cook/Seahawks D
(Gonzo/Jeffery/James were all bench players)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users