Vick will be one of the highest scoring QBs in that offense if he can stay healthy. I like Garcon over Decker. Garcon is the #1 guy while Decker is #3 or #4. Foster is obviously more valuable than Tate. It's not veto worthy but it's not a trade I would do.
Not seeing the issue.. Who knows if Tate could overtake Foster at some point with his injury/production issues. Vick is an upgrade over Manning. I've been trying to trade for Vick and I own manning. Garcon is on fire in a pass happy offense.
Other Way: Foster could step up his game and be an animal the rest of the way, Decker has a Hall of Fame QB throwing to him and is productive.. Manning, albeit inconsistent can put up serious numbers. Not a great deal, but far from veto worthy.
If 2 owners agree on a trade then it should never be vetoed. I've come to learn that in my time on these forums. Both guys obviously saw value in what they're getting, so who cares if it seems unfair to anyone else.
It's all fun and games until a fart becomes a shart.
I don't know. It looks okay. Basically, Vick for Foster. Decker can either be a dud or a stud. Garcon is the better WR. Tate is a backup and Eli is garbage.
12 person (2QB auction league)
QB: Eli Manning (NYG), Alex Smith (KC), Jason Campbell (Cle); Scott Tolzien (GB); Ryan Fitzpatrick (Ten)
WR: Jordy Nelson (GB), Michael Crabtree (SF), Riley Cooper (Phi); Rishard Matthews (Mia); Jericho Cotchery (Pit) RB: Giovani Bernard (Cin), Shane Vereen (NE); Rashad Jennings (Oak)
TE: Tony Gonzalez (Atl)
K: Stephen Gostkowski
12 person (standard league)
QB: Mike Glennon (TB); Russell Wilson (Sea)
WR: Demaryius Thomas (Den), Calvin Johnson (Det), Brandon Marshall (Chi), Keenan Allen (SD)
RB: Zac Stacy (StL), Steven Jackson (Atl), Andre Ellington (Ari), Andre Brown (NYG); Rashad Jennings (Oak)
TE: Rob Gronkowski (NE), Julius Thomas (Den)
K: Stephen Gostkowski
If vick is healthy he'll be a qb1. I wouldnt veto it. If at the end of the season vick is the top scoring qb and foster is injured and tate puts up rb1 numbers what will you tell team 1? Last season a trade was vetoed in my league. Mccoy for spiller and morris after week 1. Everyone said the team giving up mccoy was being ripped off, but if the trade went though he would of won the league getting two rb1's.
Team 1 12 team espn 10-3 qb ryan rb forte sjax wr jones jeffrey gordon te witten flex evans
k tucker def panthers/titans bn r. matthews l. murray herron k. davis starks rivers Team 2 10 team.5 ppr espn 6-7 qb wilson rb forte j. bell wr bryant gordon green te reed flex white
k vinatieri def patriots/ giants bn mason r. matthews l. murray k. davis starks
Team 3 12 team yahoo 8-5 qb romo wr bryant ju. jones rb l. bell j. bell te witten flex gordon
k tucker def ravens/browns bn t. smith l. miller herron l. murray garcon Team 4 10 team yahoo 10-4 qb brady wr megatron maclin rb d. murray l. bell te olsen flex gordon
k vinatieri def ravens/lions bn r. matthews herron t. mason randle Team 5 10 teamyahoo 8-6 qb romo wr julio jones maclin fitzgerald rb lacy anderson te kelce
k bailey def chiefs/texans/packers bn r. matthews newton baldwin a. williams Team 6 10 team 1 pt ppr auctionyahoo 9-5 qb flacco wr nelson maclin rb forte anderson te walker flex beckham jeffrey
k vinatieri def lions/ravens bn r. white j. bell stewart newton
I agree with Bwells, as a commissioner in my league, I dont think I've ever vetoed a trade. The only reason I would, is if it there were obvious signs of collusion. You have to remember, in a competitive league, NO ONE likes seeing teams improve and it's in ur interest to vote down a trade or veto it. Seems to me like both these guys are trying to improve their teams, although the trade is loopsided.