bloodface
Oct 31 2009, 09:08 PM
Left tonight's game with a sprained ankle. Hobbled off court.
Max Rockatansky
Oct 31 2009, 09:09 PM
he was playing like crap though
bloodface
Oct 31 2009, 09:10 PM
QUOTE (Max Rockatansky @ Oct 31 2009, 09:09 PM)

he was playing like crap though
The whole team was. I'm not sure if I've seen Duhon pass to Chandler once in this game, and I've seen Chandler WIDE open on at least 5 occasions.
maximtsigalko
Oct 31 2009, 09:18 PM
Grab Hughes. They have no other choice, even with Nate in the line-up D'antoni have to give at least 25 mins to Hughes this year.
ralf_gevens
Nov 1 2009, 07:30 AM
is it time to get rid of Nate?
Im very high on this guy since i drafted him in every league last year and it payed off. However this season i hate him? Time to sell/drop/trade?
NUPE_1911
Nov 1 2009, 07:35 AM
QUOTE (ralf_gevens @ Nov 1 2009, 08:30 AM)

is it time to get rid of Nate?
Im very high on this guy since i drafted him in every league last year and it payed off. However this season i hate him? Time to sell/drop/trade?
I had him last year and stayed away from him this year. His shooting is too erratic and his fg% from everywhere is downright awful for long stretches. I am sure Kryptonate will show up eventually then go away then show up. It's just the way Nate is. Chandler is the same way.
Dr. Whom
Nov 1 2009, 08:01 AM
I am hoping he is lousy for the next few games so people drop him in my league. I would vulture him from the wire instantly.
BadaBing
Nov 1 2009, 11:38 AM
QUOTE (Dr. Whom @ Nov 1 2009, 07:01 AM)

I am hoping he is lousy for the next few games so people drop him in my league. I would vulture him from the wire instantly.
Yep. I agree. Everyone is down on a player after a few games. It takes a week or two to get into your game, etc... If he's dropped in your league, it would be smart to grab him. He's likely to still give you 15/3/3/1 over the season. Pretty good pickup.
maximtsigalko
Nov 1 2009, 11:52 AM
Anyone knows news about his injury?
bloodface
Nov 1 2009, 01:37 PM
All that I saw was that he left the arena on crutches. Possibly out for a week based upon that report.
bloodface
Nov 1 2009, 01:38 PM
ahem...
Nate Robinson-G- Knicks Nov. 1 - 1:31 pm et
Nate Robinson could miss up to two weeks due to an ankle sprain he suffered during Saturday's game.
Lil' Him left the arena on crutches today, and is expected to have his ankle X-rayed today or tomorrow. With Robinson out, Larry Hughes and Toney Douglas will split time as backup guards.
Source: New York Daily News
maximtsigalko
Nov 1 2009, 01:55 PM
It's Hughes time.
bloopy
Nov 1 2009, 01:59 PM
yeah nate robinson got dropped in my 12-team league. i totally expect inconsistency from that entire knicks lineup, except for david lee.
i think robinson will be limited this year, especially with the availability of hughes & gallinari who are soaking up minutes. and dantoni isn't going to stop playing duhon, who seems to be their best pg option.
Thats Ridiculous
Nov 1 2009, 02:27 PM
i remember last year early on he was extremely bad. the worst shooting ever. huge slump streak.
then near the middle of hte season he transformed into a scoring machine.
but yeah, he's too eratic and inconsistent.
i would not want to go thru that headache of owning him again.
fantasymecca
Nov 1 2009, 03:31 PM
damn..what to do with nate lol. i own jamison and josh howard and now nate is hurt too lol. is this guy worth more than dj augustine?
TheBoondocks
Nov 1 2009, 04:15 PM
Nate Brickinson is worthless at the moment
hornrimmed_rambis
Nov 1 2009, 05:39 PM
I loved Nate last year, but that team is fundamentally different this year. Last year, every time he had a slump, he would come out of it eventually because D'Antoni had no choice but to play him 30 minutes a game. This year, not so much. D'Antoni would rather not depend on Nate. The development of Chandler, the emergence of Gallo, and others has meant that he doesn't have to. He can get scoring elsewhere. Al Harrington can do that off the bench. Gallo can light it up. So if Nate is reduced to backup PG, there's a real time problem there. And with the injury, he might just be droppable in 12-man leagues.
Nate will have his moments, but won't have the consistent minutes to be reliable even when healthy.
st1010
Nov 1 2009, 11:54 PM
dropped him for frye, hope it works..
paqman78
Nov 2 2009, 10:56 AM
QUOTE (Dr. Whom @ Nov 1 2009, 01:01 PM)

I am hoping he is lousy for the next few games so people drop him in my league. I would vulture him from the wire instantly.
Someone already did in my 14 team h2h. Crazy. I've just put a waiver request for him at the expense of Morrow.
negrotiator
Nov 7 2009, 02:56 AM
Somebody dropped him tonight in a 12-teamer. Worth #3 waiver?
BadaBing
Nov 7 2009, 12:58 PM
QUOTE (negrotiator @ Nov 7 2009, 01:56 AM)

Somebody dropped him tonight in a 12-teamer. Worth #3 waiver?
Wrong forum... but 12 team league, I can't see why anything better would be out there.
snarf snarf
Nov 10 2009, 02:25 PM
Sounds like he could be back as early as tomorrow or Friday. As per Yahoo's player update.
QUOTE
Nov 10 Robinson (ankle) could return as early as Wednesday's game against the Hawks, the New York Times reports.
Recommendation: Coach Mike D'Antoni told the media on Tuesday that Robinson could play as early as Wednesday night's game against the Hawks. The Knicks only have two more games this week, but Robinson's return would be a boon to all the fantasy teams that drafted him expecting him to post the big minutes and stats he had in the second half of last season.
If he was dropped in leagues is now the time to add him?
maybach
Nov 10 2009, 07:39 PM
..now would be a great time to get him, but for some reason I am getting bad vibes about his playing time. Hughes, Gallinari, Toney Douglas, plus Duhon is healthy, there's only so many minutes you know?
Thats Ridiculous
Nov 10 2009, 07:46 PM
i heard he wasn't gonna play til next week since there's only 2 games this week.
i picked him up in 1 of my leagues last night. need his 3's.
headchopper
Nov 13 2009, 06:48 PM
i have about 10 minutes to find out..Any help out there?
Edit: i think i found my answer
Gifted
Nov 13 2009, 06:53 PM
QUOTE (headchopper @ Nov 13 2009, 03:48 PM)

i have about 10 minutes to find out..Any help out there?
Edit: i think i found my answer
Yes
Obangajanga
Nov 18 2009, 09:53 PM
Ugg, only played 12 minutes.
Anyone watched the game? Why'd he play so little?
With the AI rumors too, darn. I've got him in 2 leagues. :/
I suppose he's somewhat droppable?
fantasymecca
Nov 18 2009, 10:30 PM
i dropped him. im not touching anyone from the knicks until they figure out their rotation. clearly they have no idea what players they want to start since the team itself is garbage.
gsw
Nov 19 2009, 02:28 AM
Dropping him right now too.
Swirsky Stars
Nov 19 2009, 02:33 AM
Are we sticking a fork in him? I managed to get CDR for him so at least I can count on consistent minutes, but man Nate can be huge if he gets the time (remember last years two month run of 20-4-4 with 1.5 stls/3's?)...problem is the Knicks just have too much depth (of trash) that they are "utilizing" ahead of him.
fantasymecca
Nov 19 2009, 02:39 AM
i dropped him already. the knicks don't even have a legit lineup and it's 4 weeks in the season. besides, knicks more shooters now than last year so that means less touches for some players. personally i wouldn't touch anyone of them until someone blows up either than larry hughes.
paqman78
Nov 19 2009, 02:59 AM
QUOTE (Swirsky Stars @ Nov 19 2009, 07:33 AM)

Are we sticking a fork in him? I managed to get CDR for him so at least I can count on consistent minutes, but man Nate can be huge if he gets the time (remember last years two month run of 20-4-4 with 1.5 stls/3's?)...problem is the Knicks just have too much depth (of trash) that they are "utilizing" ahead of him.
Im dropping him for Iverson if they decide to sign him.
BadaBing
Nov 19 2009, 12:30 PM
Could they trade him? He's on a one year deal right? That's somewhat attractive to a team needing a spark.
Denbo32
Nov 19 2009, 12:46 PM
QUOTE (BadaBing @ Nov 19 2009, 12:30 PM)

Could they trade him? He's on a one year deal right? That's somewhat attractive to a team needing a spark.
Nate will veto most trades I believe. Unless maybe the Lakers/Spurs/Boston tried to trade then maybe. But for Nate to get traded he needs to give up his Bird rights, which means he can't do a sign and trade which is basically the best way for him to make a ton of money this off season.
markdash
Nov 19 2009, 12:53 PM
QUOTE (Denbo32 @ Nov 19 2009, 09:46 AM)

Nate will veto most trades I believe. Unless maybe the Lakers/Spurs/Boston tried to trade then maybe. But for Nate to get traded he needs to give up his Bird rights, which means he can't do a sign and trade which is basically the best way for him to make a ton of money this off season.
Bird rights get traded along with a player. The only player in the NBA who has a true "no-trade" clause is Kobe Bryant, I believe.
Denbo32
Nov 19 2009, 01:04 PM
QUOTE (markdash @ Nov 19 2009, 12:53 PM)

Bird rights get traded along with a player. The only player in the NBA who has a true "no-trade" clause is Kobe Bryant, I believe.
Umm isn't the bird rights for being with the same team for 3+ years? I don't see how that goes with him if he is traded.
Denbo32
Nov 19 2009, 01:06 PM
hmm nevermind, misunderstood bird rights.
tazdingo
Nov 19 2009, 01:30 PM
What happens to his value if AI gets signed by the Knicks? My guess is down the toilet since they play almost the same way...
TMC
Nov 19 2009, 01:45 PM
QUOTE (tazdingo @ Nov 19 2009, 02:30 PM)

What happens to his value if AI gets signed by the Knicks? My guess is down the toilet since they play almost the same way...
i agree, down the drain since they are both small and play similar styles. AI might even have more value if he gets signed and has the star name to start
BadaBing
Nov 19 2009, 02:43 PM
I hate to say this, but even in 12 team leagues, I think Nate is droppable once AI signs. He wasn't getting the minutes without AI. Now he'll have to contend with Douglas, Duhon, and Hughes for backup minutes. Ugly!
chinkypuff
Nov 19 2009, 02:49 PM
yea i think nate is done..... he helped me so much last year.
i think he is already droppable without AI signing since he's barely getting any playing time already. with AI signing he can't be used at all....
Swirsky Stars
Nov 19 2009, 02:50 PM
QUOTE (BadaBing @ Nov 19 2009, 02:43 PM)

I hate to say this, but even in 12 team leagues, I think Nate is droppable once AI signs. He wasn't getting the minutes without AI. Now he'll have to contend with Douglas, Duhon, and Hughes for backup minutes. Ugly!
For those in 12 teamers with AI still available, I would probably make the switch ASAP. AI is going to go somewhere, and even if he goes to the Heat he will probably still produce better than Nate (giving his current terrible situation in NY [as hard as that is to believe]). NY has to clean up some space on the roster for him to play and sadly I don't see it happening for awhile (and I was/am still a Nate Rob supporter)...looks like we're going to have to wait for another second half sexplosion from Nate if the Knicks can dump a lot of salary and PT at the trade deadline.
paqman78
Nov 20 2009, 07:02 AM
Arent the Knicks trying to move one of their players before they sign Iverson? If they ship Duhon out, it might not be the end of the world for Nate.
fsu_surfer
Nov 20 2009, 10:28 AM
QUOTE (chinkypuff @ Nov 19 2009, 02:49 PM)

yea i think nate is done..... he helped me so much last year.
i think he is already droppable without AI signing since he's barely getting any playing time already. with AI signing he can't be used at all....
He helped me a great deal also last year, but he has been on the ww for over a week in my league, and most likely not goin anywhere soon. It is always a little weird watching guys collect dust on the ww one year, when just a month/year before were the hottest thing in fantasy sports. Such is fantasy...
paqman78
Nov 20 2009, 10:30 AM
Knicks pass on Iverson. Nate still has hope!
BadaBing
Nov 20 2009, 10:37 AM
Start the guy now! Why the hell not? Duhan and Douglass have proven nothing.
paqman78
Nov 20 2009, 10:42 AM
QUOTE (BadaBing @ Nov 20 2009, 03:37 PM)

Start the guy now! Why the hell not? Duhan and Douglass have proven nothing.
I agree. It should be Hughes and Robinson in the backcourt - with Hughes running the point.
Swirsky Stars
Nov 20 2009, 11:28 AM
Looks like D'Antoni and co. used that defibulator to keep Nate from totally flatlining. There's still hope!
paqman78
Nov 20 2009, 11:45 AM
QUOTE (Swirsky Stars @ Nov 20 2009, 04:28 PM)

Looks like D'Antoni and co. used that defibulator to keep Nate from totally flatlining. There's still hope!
...and Duhon left their last game with an arm or shoulder injury. D'Antoni might just be forced to give Nate more than just 16 mins off the bench. Fingers, toes and eyes crossed.
Thats Ridiculous
Nov 20 2009, 01:49 PM
Nate to the rescue!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.