Why because you couldn't read the signs right?Go back through and read how many posts there were about how great the start was going to be. One thing I am learning this year, more then any other, opposing viewpoints are not welcome. Isn't worth the hassle.
There were also some "temper your expectations" posts as well. Did you not see those?You seem confused, so let me help. Opposing viewpoints ARE welcome. They really are. "He's 19.You can't project a 19 year old to be a top 8 ACE, he'll likely be a 2-3." There was also a Cole Hamels discussion. These were productive.
Facts are also welcome. Got something about K rate? How his pitch selection may not translate?
See the problem is you come into the Trevor Story Thread with a 7 game sample size to try to prove a point, or come into this thread AFTER a 19 year old struggles to say "easy sit."
Those aren't opposing viewpoints. Those are you using ridiculously SSS, after the fact, to make a point that often isn't valid.
Do you understand the difference?
See my point is made. All I said was that it was an easy sit. Give me a break for not posting everything I think. I learned very well in the Story thread that opposing viewpoints aren't welcome. When I looked at the thread before going to sleep all I saw was 5-7 innings , 1 run or less, and other BS. I wasn't getting involved and wished to God I hadn't posted what I did now.Do you understand that to me (and I am sure others) that it was an easy sit with all the negatives that were there? It doesn't matter if the game had been played yet the negatives were there. You and others didn't see it that way fine, no problem.
OMG, this is gonna turn into another Mazara thread...