HooDat

Members
  • Content count

    385
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

50 Excellent

About HooDat

  • Rank
    Veteran

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

568 profile views
  1. Commissioner Question

    Agreed with Afc. I would think since you specified the last 2 playoff seeds would make it in based on total points for, that they would also be seeded based on total points for. W/L record only relevant for top 4 teams. That's how I'd interpret it, but ultimately it's up to you as commish
  2. Awesome job addressing the point of the post. My only point was that proving collusion is not an easy task, usually not possible. What part of that is "Wrong. Plain and simple." Unless you're omniscient or have all your leaguemates' houses bugged, you can't prove s--- in most circumstances. That's why vetoes need to be on the table for heavily unbalanced trades
  3. Chubb or Jones ROS? 0.5 PPR

    Appreciate the help everyone and the consensus here seems to be Chubb, interesting bc FantasyPros seems to have Jones a good bit higher https://www.fantasypros.com/2018/11/fantasy-football-trade-value-chart-week-11/ Any thoughts why?
  4. Uhh Hyde is worthless, so it's Carson (dinged up and in a 3 headed committee) for Chubb. Not even close really
  5. A league with no veto sounds wack. Trades should not be insta-processed. Now this specific trade isn't too egregious tbh, def not a "league ruiner" as you put it A lot of people on these forums have the opinion that as long as there's no proven collusion, the trade should go through every time, but I disagree. It's almost impossible to prove collusion between 2 people unless you have personally seen the texts/chatlog/whatever. Proving collusion isn't possible in most situations, it just isn't. If player A (8-2 record) trades Jimmy Graham to player B (2-8 record) for Saquon Barkley, and you ask player B about it, all he has to say is "I needed a TE." You can't definitively prove that collusion took place, but it still hurts the competitive integrity of the league, and should be vetoed. TLDR: Trade isn't that bad, but vetoes should always be an option as collusion can't be proven 99% of the time
  6. First off, a league with no veto sounds wack. Now that trade isn't too egregious tbh, def not a "league ruiner" as you put it A lot of people on these forums have the opinion that as long as there's no proven collusion, the trade should go through every time, but I disagree. It's almost impossible to prove collusion between 2 people unless you have personally seen the texts/chatlog/whatever. Proving collusion isn't possible in most situations, it just isn't. If player A (8-2 record) trades Jimmy Graham to player B (2-8 record) for Saquon Barkley, and you ask player B about it, all he has to say is "I needed a TE." You can't definitively prove that collusion took place, but it still hurts the competitive integrity of the league, and should be vetoed. TLDR: Trade isn't that bad, but vetoes should always be an option as collusion can't be proven 99% of the time
  7. Which WR should I start?

    I'd go Courtland, think he'll produce nicely down the stretch
  8. Fair trade and you could make it work going into playoffs with Diggs + Boyd. But I think I'd hold firm, OBJ still killing, will prob still kill it even if Eli gets benched
  9. It's close but I think I'd do that for Mixon. Mixon also plays OAK and CLE weeks 15-16 during semis/finals, should be money
  10. Start Hilton or Watkins?

    I'd start Hilton with Watkins having that foot issue
  11. Pick 2 Thursday edition WHIR

    Really tough but I think I'd go with Lockett and Martin vs the Cards. TE such a crapshoot, I'd prob go with Hooper who's been trending up. Could see Graham having a bounceback game tonight tho
  12. Boyd for sure for sure. Other 2 are closer, in standard I'd go Doug, PPR I'd go Baldwin who supposedly feels healthy now
  13. It's a lateral move, but if you need to win out these last 3 weeks I'd do it to avoid the bye
  14. I'd go with Dougie here. He has a strong matchup against Arizona and who knows what will happen in the Seahawks RB stable
  15. Yeesh think I might actually start Hooper. Don't know what to think about the Seahawks RBs