dashoe

Established Members
  • Content Count

    13,829
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

dashoe last won the day on October 25 2018

dashoe had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

5,699 Excellent

3 Followers

About dashoe

  • Rank
    All-Time Great

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

6,441 profile views
  1. why do you not ask why do people post every week the same posts about this is the week Lesean will be the rb1 in KC when it has never happened? My post has been FACTUALLY TRUE every week since the day Reid made the statement yet people somehow think because they own mccoy, damien or darrell that things will magically change and they will own the KC bellcow. You all are HOPING despite the quantifiable facts of what Reid has implemented in his gameplans. Only injury will change the current situation of this backfield πŸ˜‚
  2. β€œI did a little bit of that back when I was in Philadelphia,” Reid said. β€œKind of a running-back-by-committee deal and we had some success with it. We’ll do that here. We ended up drafting a kid there also and then the other Williams (Darrel) isn’t bad either. So we’ve got a couple of Williamses and then Carlos (Hyde) and then we’ve got a new little guy in there (Darwin Thompson). We’ve got a good nucleus of players. I think we’re going to be good at that spot. And they all have their strengths, and we’ll try to exploit their strengths there.” With a committee approach, typically teams will ride the hot hand during a game.
  3. I know enough about you from your postings to know that you complain yet support the very thing you complain about. That is all I need to know. Maybe you don't know anything about you? πŸ€”
  4. I can't retire from posting in response to illogical posts by those who spout off things that make the head scratch and then accuse people of siding with an issue they are opposed with because of their faux moral outrage. The fact is if Tyreek Hill playing in the NFL and making millions bothers you.Then stop supporting the NFL and their ability to make billions in revenue to pay players that you don't like millions which includes fantasy football. You don't have the courage of your conviction or you are simply the person who is all hat no cattle πŸ˜‚
  5. So basically you are so outraged by an admitted domestic abuser playing in the NFL that you complain about it on a fantasy forum. Yet you know the NFL employed the admitted abuser and you continue to watch NFL games ? Playing fantasy and watching NFL games adds revenues to the NFL which filters down to the domestic abuser that you hate. You are indirectly contributing to the economic well being of hill and enabling his behavior. The 2 things that you complain about I see your moral outrage has been conveniently compromised πŸ˜‚
  6. I dont have an opinion on if he is an abuser because I didnt follow the full case nor do I have all of the facts. So I am not sure why you state I disagree when I never gave my view on his case. You have no factual basis to stand on other than labeling me to fit your narrative πŸ˜‚
  7. no. I get it perfectly. yet you seem to be focused on the individual and his income and not the system that allows it and you reference his earnings as if that makes a difference. The income is irrelevant to the percieved act of injustice. In other words domestic abuse is domestic abuse whether it be committed by prince or pauper πŸ˜‚
  8. You are complaining on a fantasy football board about a player earning an income in the NFL because you believe he is an abuser. You are complaining he makes millions which is paid to him by his employer who has investigated his case. That's called outrage. πŸ˜‚