Yeah I got duke late 5/ early 6 late in draft season after sniping him in 10 most of the draft season. I only play ppr so he’s a guy I wanted tons of shares of.
hyde looked good, better than I thought. but the holes were huge and looked like mostly cutbacks so I think it had to do with specific plays called for him in a package. It’s worth noting duke had a big false start called on him on blitz pickup play and was hit and miss generally in blitz pickup.
Still, this offense can float a committee so I don’t think it’s that duke people or Hyde people have to be right, there could be value both ways.
It would have been some other JAG in hydes role even if they didn’t sign Hyde. 12-18 touches for duke was always probably the plan.