Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

bibigon

Should Turnovers Routinely Be Punted?

29 posts in this topic

Obviously turnovers account for as many points as any other category. However, most of the top players also turn the ball over a ton, simply by virtue of having the ball in their hands a lot. Consider an all-star team with LeBron, Durant, Chris Paul, Kevin Love, etc... That team would finish with a 1 in turnovers by a huge margin. Good players turn the ball over. It's the price you pay for excellence in the other categories.

It seems to me that the teams that do best in turnovers would be the teams with s---y squads, or the teams that have stopped paying attention and are running Brandon Rush and Kawhi Leonard out there every day right now. The teams at the top, the ones that have drafted and traded well meanwhile, are doing it in spite of a poor ranking in turnovers.

Am I wrong? Should turnovers count in player assessments if you're trying to actually win the league? Are the teams winning your league doing it with an excellent rating in turnovers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the root debate for 8 category vs. 9 category leagues.

Your observation (which I'm sure many share) about elite players having high turnovers definitely makes sense. However, I think this common idea that punting turnovers is the way to go for building an elite H2H squad is a fallacy. I'm not saying draft with the intentions of finding low TO guys at the sacrifice of better contributors. However, since everyone seems to ignore this category, simply avoiding some of the higher TO players throughout the draft will lead to easy victories in this category on a weekly basis.

Everyone should approach the TO category with the same analysis they would with others, because it's just that, one of the nine categories. Of course if your team is built around "small ball" with the intentions of winning assists, TOs will certainly be punted. Since I think TO's is a category that can easily be won, it factors into my opinion that a "big team" build for H2H is always the better (and my favorite) strategy (but that's an entirely different discussion).

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Far from the truth. Using studs like CP3 and Al Jefferson you can pull a low TO championship caliber team. I did it last yr with a core of Paul, Jefferson, and Wade as my big 3 and won TOs almost every week, landing the 2nd seed. It's a plus to be TO conscious but not necessary. I just go Best player for the first several rounds and don't consider the TOs unless it's one of my 1st rounder's core strengths.

Obviously turnovers account for as many points as any other category. However, most of the top players also turn the ball over a ton, simply by virtue of having the ball in their hands a lot. Consider an all-star team with LeBron, Durant, Chris Paul, Kevin Love, etc... That team would finish with a 1 in turnovers by a huge margin. Good players turn the ball over. It's the price you pay for excellence in the other categories.

It seems to me that the teams that do best in turnovers would be the teams with s---y squads, or the teams that have stopped paying attention and are running Brandon Rush and Kawhi Leonard out there every day right now. The teams at the top, the ones that have drafted and traded well meanwhile, are doing it in spite of a poor ranking in turnovers.

Am I wrong? Should turnovers count in player assessments if you're trying to actually win the league? Are the teams winning your league doing it with an excellent rating in turnovers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I should have been clear I was talking about roto.

I'm in a particularly strange league that also has a $65M salary cap (we use actual NBA player salaries), so even fitting two guys like Chris Paul and Al Jefferson under the cap is close to impossible. But in general, right now the team in the first place is last place in turnovers. The team in 2nd is in 15th place, etc... That's what's led me to wonder whether it's folly to even worry about the category.

I traded Monta Ellis for Gallinari in this league the other day, largely on the basis of similar production, but way fewer turnovers. However in retrospect, I'm wondering whether it's worth bothering with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ive punted turnovers every year since i started playing, and i've never placed lower than 2nd. definitely the way to go.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I should have been clear I was talking about roto.

I'm in a particularly strange league that also has a $65M salary cap (we use actual NBA player salaries), so even fitting two guys like Chris Paul and Al Jefferson under the cap is close to impossible. But in general, right now the team in the first place is last place in turnovers. The team in 2nd is in 15th place, etc... That's what's led me to wonder whether it's folly to even worry about the category.

I traded Monta Ellis for Gallinari in this league the other day, largely on the basis of similar production, but way fewer turnovers. However in retrospect, I'm wondering whether it's worth bothering with.

yea, i dont think that was a good trade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to's can't be completely punted, unless your draft turns out that way. A mediocre player with high TO becomes a bad player. Just got to treat it like a category. Just like ft% with Dwight.... gotta make a decision on team draft/makeup

we do have great players... like cp3.... it also depends on position. and intermixing players.

you can't just put all low to players on one team.

however, you also don't want a center with too much high to's.... etc etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TO is definitely one of the toughest categories to control, because if you try to cater too much to it, you end up sacrificing 2 or 3 other categories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can win a league either way. I'll hit you guys with a little "cool story bro". I've played in a redraft roto league with some buddies for five years. Last time I won it in 09-10, I had a low TO team. I think I had Jefferson, Billups, Horford, and Camby as my top 4 picks that year. I always thought Billups and Camby in their primes were two great guys to target if you didn't want to punt TOs. Camby would carry BLKs and boards, and get you tons of steals for a big man. Billups would carry 3s and FT%, and not turn it over much for a PG. You have to go with that strategy early if you don't want to finish near the bottom in TOs.

This year, I'm in first in the league right now and my team turns it over at a ridiculous pace. I have Harden, Holiday, Jennings, Z-Bo, Mayo, and Asik, all who are averaging 2.5 TOs or more. There's no set prescription for punting TOs or not, but it's fun to see if you can win a league in both modes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously turnovers account for as many points as any other category. Howeandver, most of the top players also turn the ball over a ton, simply by virtue of having the ball in their hands a lot. Consider an all-star team with LeBron, Durant, Chris Paul, Kevin Love, etc... That team would finish with a 1 in turnovers by a huge margin. Good players turn the ball over. It's the price you pay for excellence in the other categories.

It seems to me that the teams that do best in turnovers would be the teams with s---y squads, or the teams that have stopped paying attention and are running Brandon Rush and Kawhi Leonard out there every day right now. The teams at the top, the ones that have drafted and traded well meanwhile, are doing it in spite of a poor ranking in turnovers.

Am I wrong? Should turnovers count in player assessments if you're trying to actually win the league? Are the teams winning your league doing it with an excellent rating in turnovers?

If you are at least turnover-conscious, you'll probably at least do better in TOs than the other owners who don't care for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are at least turnover-conscious, you'll probably at least do better in TOs than the other owners who don't care for them.

Well this is what I'm wondering. If I get a heist of a deal and trade say, George Hill for Jrue Holiday, then I'm going to do worse in turnovers, even though the deal is a win for me. As you move on up the list of the highest ranked players, you're going to find more and more turnovers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct. So you shouldn't outright punt but rather be aware of it. If you aren't, on weeks when you have 35 games to your opps 45 games, it sucks to lose 0-9 including turnovers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In 12 teams or less in 9-cat it's near impossible to win a competitive league with punting any single category.

You would basically have to get 12's or 11's in all categories elsewhere in a 12 man league and even then chances are you still won't win the league. Honestly in a 10 man league you'd have to get super lucky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turnovers is one of the few categories you can punt and still win the league, because of its direct relationship with assists. That is, the more assists a team generates, the more turnovers as well. Of course there are exceptions to every rule, but the correlation is there.

In general, it's difficult to score more than 18 points combined between assists and turnovers for this very reason. As a result, if you were to get a 12 in assists and a 1 in turnovers, you wouldn't be far off from the maximum possible score and therefore would still be competitive in the league.

The problem with just punting turnovers outright is that if your team is also weak in assists you will have an almost impossible mountain to climb to be tops in the league. Scoring a 6 in assists and a 2 in turnovers, for example, will put you at a significant disadvantage to a turnover-conscious team (i.e. one that had a 7 in assists and a 7 in turnovers).

All this being said, if you happen to hit the exacta in your draft and all your sleepers pay off, etc., then you will almost certainly end up with a high TO team. Your strength in assists and the other categories should more than make up for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another aspect is that a lot of people share this viewpoint in most leagues. If a majority of your league punts TOs then you are at an inherent disadvantage by following suit. Then there is the subtlety of exploiting the player ranker itself. Ryan Anderson is the perfect example of this. His TOs are epically low hence his ranking is absurdly high. We can all agree the he is not trully as valuable as his top 10 ranking says it is but it certainly helps facilitate a trade or even to have the perception of having a great player. My main point on this subject though is that I don't like to manage my team around negative categories. It seems backwards.

After all this my main team is pretty TO conscious. I don't adjust my rankings or draft differently, I just pick the best available player, but thats just the way it came through in the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TO is definitely one of the toughest categories to control, because if you try to cater too much to it, you end up sacrificing 2 or 3 other categories.

Truth. TO's fluctuate and varies too much weekly.

Instead of punting TO, you should always punt FG%. I'm doing it myself and it has the most success.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turnovers should pretty much never be punted, in fact they are imo the worst category to punt unless you are playing in a really expert league since even good fantasy players underrate them. But what is important is that since they are the most often punted category they are also the easiest to win.

The category that should be punted the most are assists and its not even close except to the owner who drafts Howard and is forced to punt ft%. Not only are guards who get a ton of assists insanely reached for and overrated but like one of the posters above said they are in direct correlation to turnovers. In other words its easy to win turnovers and lose assists and then dominate every other category except steals since most pgs who get a lot of assists get a lot of steals as well.

But in reality you shouldnt punt anything as its easy enough to draft a team who is really good at everything. You don't want people who just get low turnovers, you want people who get low turnovers for their production. Guys like Cp3, Al Jeff, Al Horford, Ibaka, Ryan Anderson, Tyson Chandler, KG etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't about the general principle, but a specific situation:

I play in a regular league and then join random public leagues each year. I've noticed in the random public leagues eventually a number of players just give up and ignore their teams and don't set lineups. It's not the coolest thing for them to do, for sure, but what that usually means is that five points are off the board right away from those five teams who aren't setting their lineups and are therefore not turning the ball over at all. In leagues like that, I simply ignore TOs on draft day; I don't go out of my way to draft high-TO players, I just draft the players I want or need for the categories I care about more. I know that my best competitors are only going to get a couple more points than me off TOs even if they try superhard to control TOs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turnovers is one of the few categories you can punt and still win the league, because of its direct relationship with assists.

It is not a direct relationship to assists.

But it does have a correlation with how much a player handles the ball. Just about every team's best players make more turnovers than the "lesser involved" players. But still not direct, as some players are better about turning the ball over than others.

Hence PGs generally having the highest TO rate, they handle the ball the most for the most part.

So yeah good players who bring you good stats are generally going to come with higher TOs as well. That's the trick in 9-cat you gotta find the guy who is pretty close everyone else but turns the ball over less.

Turnovers is a category that can net your roto team just as many points as pts, rebs, or any other category for that matter.

In H2H screw TOs, but in roto you have to keep them in mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turnovers should pretty much never be punted, in fact they are imo the worst category to punt unless you are playing in a really expert league since even good fantasy players underrate them. But what is important is that since they are the most often punted category they are also the easiest to win.

The category that should be punted the most are assists and its not even close except to the owner who drafts Howard and is forced to punt ft%. Not only are guards who get a ton of assists insanely reached for and overrated but like one of the posters above said they are in direct correlation to turnovers. In other words its easy to win turnovers and lose assists and then dominate every other category except steals since most pgs who get a lot of assists get a lot of steals as well.

But in reality you shouldnt punt anything as its easy enough to draft a team who is really good at everything. You don't want people who just get low turnovers, you want people who get low turnovers for their production. Guys like Cp3, Al Jeff, Al Horford, Ibaka, Ryan Anderson, Tyson Chandler, KG etc

It'd probbaly work in roto leagues. It will not work in H2H.

Like I said, right above your post, TO fluctuates like crazy weekly. Also, by punting assist, you also lose a lot of steals. 9/11 of the top steals per game this are point guards. Only 3 of the 11 are under 5 assist per game, Jason Kidd, Crash and Tony Allen. If you punt your assist, don't expect your steals to be good either.

--

The best punting strategy is to build your entire team with Point Guards, and high assist SG, SF's(Kobe, Pierce). Point Guard give you specifically 5 categories: FT%, 3s, Points, Assist and Steals. Personally, I punt the other 4 categories to excel in my 5 categories I'm stacking on.

This doesn't work with big men. Why? Think about it. Big men gives you stats in only 4 categories: FG%, Rebounds, Blocks, sometimes Points, and, sometimes, low TO.

You can find out more about the strategy here: http://forums.rotoworld.com/index.php?showtopic=313340

Look at the Chris Paul Stack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd probbaly work in roto leagues. It will not work in H2H.

Like I said, right above your post, TO fluctuates like crazy weekly. Also, by punting assist, you also lose a lot of steals. 9/11 of the top steals per game this are point guards. Only 3 of the 11 are under 5 assist per game, Jason Kidd, Crash and Tony Allen. If you punt your assist, don't expect your steals to be good either.

--

The best punting strategy is to build your entire team with Point Guards, and high assist SG, SF's(Kobe, Pierce). Point Guard give you specifically 5 categories: FT%, 3s, Points, Assist and Steals. Personally, I punt the other 4 categories to excel in my 5 categories I'm stacking on.

This doesn't work with big men. Why? Think about it. Big men gives you stats in only 4 categories: FG%, Rebounds, Blocks, sometimes Points, and, sometimes, low TO.

You can find out more about the strategy here: http://forums.rotowo...howtopic=313340

Look at the Chris Paul Stack.

Even if you were to get all 12 points in the other 8 cats and 1 in TO another team could get 11 in all cats and would only need 10 in TOs to beat you. Yes unlikely but it's a scenario that is at least equally as likley as you getting 12 points in all non TO cats in a competitive league.

In a 10 man roto league it's damn near impossible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd probbaly work in roto leagues. It will not work in H2H.

Like I said, right above your post, TO fluctuates like crazy weekly. Also, by punting assist, you also lose a lot of steals. 9/11 of the top steals per game this are point guards. Only 3 of the 11 are under 5 assist per game, Jason Kidd, Crash and Tony Allen. If you punt your assist, don't expect your steals to be good either.

--

The best punting strategy is to build your entire team with Point Guards, and high assist SG, SF's(Kobe, Pierce). Point Guard give you specifically 5 categories: FT%, 3s, Points, Assist and Steals. Personally, I punt the other 4 categories to excel in my 5 categories I'm stacking on.

This doesn't work with big men. Why? Think about it. Big men gives you stats in only 4 categories: FG%, Rebounds, Blocks, sometimes Points, and, sometimes, low TO.

You can find out more about the strategy here: http://forums.rotowo...howtopic=313340

Look at the Chris Paul Stack.

Even if you were to get all 12 points in the other 8 cats and 1 in TO another team could get 11 in all cats and would only need 10 in TOs to beat you. Yes unlikely but it's a scenario that is at least equally as likley as you getting 12 points in all non TO cats in a competitive league.

In a 10 man roto league it's damn near impossible.

I've never tried the strategy in a Roto League. It works well in H2H though. And my strategy is to get max points in 5/9 categories. I doubt anyone can get max points in 8/9 in a competitive league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turnovers should pretty much never be punted, in fact they are imo the worst category to punt unless you are playing in a really expert league since even good fantasy players underrate them. But what is important is that since they are the most often punted category they are also the easiest to win.

The category that should be punted the most are assists and its not even close except to the owner who drafts Howard and is forced to punt ft%. Not only are guards who get a ton of assists insanely reached for and overrated but like one of the posters above said they are in direct correlation to turnovers. In other words its easy to win turnovers and lose assists and then dominate every other category except steals since most pgs who get a lot of assists get a lot of steals as well.

But in reality you shouldnt punt anything as its easy enough to draft a team who is really good at everything. You don't want people who just get low turnovers, you want people who get low turnovers for their production. Guys like Cp3, Al Jeff, Al Horford, Ibaka, Ryan Anderson, Tyson Chandler, KG etc

It'd probbaly work in roto leagues. It will not work in H2H.

Like I said, right above your post, TO fluctuates like crazy weekly. Also, by punting assist, you also lose a lot of steals. 9/11 of the top steals per game this are point guards. Only 3 of the 11 are under 5 assist per game, Jason Kidd, Crash and Tony Allen. If you punt your assist, don't expect your steals to be good either.

--

The best punting strategy is to build your entire team with Point Guards, and high assist SG, SF's(Kobe, Pierce). Point Guard give you specifically 5 categories: FT%, 3s, Points, Assist and Steals. Personally, I punt the other 4 categories to excel in my 5 categories I'm stacking on.

This doesn't work with big men. Why? Think about it. Big men gives you stats in only 4 categories: FG%, Rebounds, Blocks, sometimes Points, and, sometimes, low TO.

You can find out more about the strategy here: http://forums.rotowo...howtopic=313340

Look at the Chris Paul Stack.

No my post was for h2h too. Personally I play a lot of h2h in highly competitive leagues. I never tank anything since i'm able to be at worst average (usually assists and steals) at 1-2 cats and then great in the rest. It's by far the best strategy imo.

Also TO's do not flux like "crazy" each week, this is an absolute myth. Yes there is some variance but there is variance in every single cat, some slightly more than others but none of them are drastic. And no your tank 4 cats and dominate 5 is not even close to the best tanking strat, it's actually one of the worst ones out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.