motown magic

Too much for Betts ?

Recommended Posts

Made an offer of Benintendi ( 2 ) , Pollock ( 1 ) and Robles for Mookie (2)

Years they can be kept next to their name.

i already have Blackmon and Hoskins in my outfield. I'll probably drop Pollock anyway.

We only keep 7 and I have Sale , Schoop , Trea Turner, Josh Bell and Chapman( or Paxton )

So either Pollock, Chapman , Bell or Paxton would be dropped if I don't make this trade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you were going to drop Pollock anyways and being that you can only keep 7(can't keep Robles either), seems like a no brainer deal on your part.  Not sure the other owner will take it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

anytime offers include guys you are not keeping anyway its not "too much" that said as I like Baseball stated other owner might not be able to keep those guys either so they may not do it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stay put with the Benintendi side counter and move Sale for Mookie. Then keep Betts in that spot, and dangle some more arms for more sticks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, I like baseball said:

Well if you were going to drop Pollock anyways and being that you can only keep 7(can't keep Robles either), seems like a no brainer deal on your part.  Not sure the other owner will take it.

 

Agree with this. It's essentially Benintendi for Betts. Easy call. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, parrothead said:

anytime offers include guys you are not keeping anyway its not "too much"

While I somewhat agree with this philosophy the downside is if you trade them away you can't draft then again. 

 

For example, I'm stacked in a 10 team keep 7 league, I'm keeping degrom and Severino. But there's no way in hell I'm trading Nola away because I really want him on my team again next year.

 

But I do like the deal, I'd do it if they accept it.

Edited by SwayzeExpress

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I guess I wasn't clear enough in my post and I can see where it looks like it's just been BENINTENDI for BETTS and it would be a no-brainer

 But  ROBLES I can also go with the deal because he's a minor leaguer so it's basically a two for one

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted it and he rejected it  

i may try to package Pollock with somebody else or just say screw it and drop him . only  year left . All

mt others have two left 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.