SpecialFNK

Mitch Garver 2019 Outlook

tonycpsu

[Automated message: This outlook thread for the 2019 season will be locked on 2019-11-28. Please finish any 2019 discussions here, and take any 2020 outlook discussions to the 2020 outlook thread . If one does not exist, feel free to create one. Thanks!]

Message added by tonycpsu

Recommended Posts

He’s now the #1 catcher for the season despite part time playing. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Mongeese said:

Looks like some DH ABs just opened up.

Would be classic Twins to give these at bats to Adrianza or someone else, but as a Garver owner, really hoping he just stays at Dh while Cruz is out and plays everyday. He's earned it for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jvfantasy said:

Is Garver a drop at this point?

Not even close

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, jvfantasy said:

Is Garver a drop at this point?

No but super frustrating when you're battling for $50 and the top seed on the last week of the regular season and he's sat 4 of the last 5. Ugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, murraygd13 said:

Not even close

I'm a very happy Garver owner and in first place so can't complain, but he has been no better than guys like Tom Murphy, Danny Jansen, Yan Gomes lately. Do you think the Twins will magically decide to play the guy more often? They've had a clear plan that he will sit frequently, more than other starting catchers, and his production has dropped off. Just curious what your reasoning is to so firmly hold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jvfantasy said:

I'm a very happy Garver owner and in first place so can't complain, but he has been no better than guys like Tom Murphy, Danny Jansen, Yan Gomes lately. Do you think the Twins will magically decide to play the guy more often? They've had a clear plan that he will sit frequently, more than other starting catchers, and his production has dropped off. Just curious what your reasoning is to so firmly hold.

 

Yes. As soon as Astudillo is back (September 1st or sooner), they will have three catchers on the roster and not worried about having two in the lineup. Hold. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

.

Edited by BMcP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

this guy is annoying to own. It’s not his fault, but he just doesn’t play enough. Tempted to drop. Fact is, he is droppable for some people. He has been on the wire in a couple of my 12 team leagues multiple times, including as recently as about a little over a week ago.

Edited by hangin n wangin
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best argument for playing Mitch Garver more...Look at the numbers and compare them with Yordan Alvarez. Almost identical in just about every way. At worst Garver is a poor man’s Yordan. They essentially have Yordan at catcher and yet choose to play him about half of their catcher AB’s. There is no backup catcher in MLB - and not many starting catchers that should warrant benching this guy other than normal rest. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

two more tonight.

i'm starting to wonder if i need to keep him in a six player keeper league

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, tesla said:

two more tonight.

i'm starting to wonder if i need to keep him in a six player keeper league

 

i have him in my keep 8 as well, and it just crossed my mind today.  not really sure i could tho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, mehtavg2000 said:

Yet the Twins will keep playing him 1 every 3 games.  Genius!

 

i dont follow the twins much. dont have any of their players.  who could they sit???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Nelson Cruz is out for any length of time, he could see more regular AB's. Twins have quite a few injuries at this point. Buxton only plays Def and pinch runs. Cave also got hurt. So they might have to play him more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, jfazz23 said:

 

i dont follow the twins much. dont have any of their players.  who could they sit???

 

I dunno.  Maybe the other catcher who gets a minimum of 50% load?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s officially played 81 games, so half a season. Double his numbers (I know it’s not that easy, but for fun):

.275/120 runs/56 HR/122 RBI

His 156 wRC+ is 7th in MLB (minimum 300 PAs). 

He’s a catcher, so would never play a full 162, but he could’ve/should’ve gotten to 40 HR/100/100 with more consistent playing time. 

Imagine sitting this type of production consistently because of catcher defensive metrics (which are questionable at best) for Jason Castro, who BARELY measures out as more valuable defensively anyway. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Castro has not been a disaster as a hitter. In 70 games he's OPSing .777 with 12 Hrs. These numbers are well above average for a MLB catcher. It's also very possible that Garver has been so effective because he is so frequently working. I play in daily leagues and own both Garver and Castro in a couple. Catcher production has been awesome in those leagues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He also missed about 3 weeks with a high ankle sprain.  Give him another 10 games there and he's up to 90 games or so.  Another 10 starts the rest of the year, and he would be at 100.  That's not that far off from most catchers.  Any more than that and it's possible he'd wear down and not be as effective when he is playing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other thing that hurts him some, is he's a guarantee to play against a lefty.  The AL Central has very few of those.  Indians don't have one, White Sox use mostly RHP, Tigers have Boyd, Royals have Duffy.  Otherwise the starters are almost exclusive right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, murraygd13 said:

The other thing that hurts him some, is he's a guarantee to play against a lefty.  The AL Central has very few of those.  Indians don't have one, White Sox use mostly RHP, Tigers have Boyd, Royals have Duffy.  Otherwise the starters are almost exclusive right.

Right. Because Garver is crazy v. LHP. But he’s also a stud v. RHP. Pan mentioned Castro’s .777 OPS, above average for a catcher. Garver has a .899 OPS v. RHP (and 1.181 v. LHP!). Garver should be playing 4-5 times per week. There’s really no justification otherwise.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Backdoor Slider said:

Right. Because Garver is crazy v. LHP. But he’s also a stud v. RHP. Pan mentioned Castro’s .777 OPS, above average for a catcher. Garver has a .899 OPS v. RHP (and 1.181 v. LHP!). Garver should be playing 4-5 times per week. There’s really no justification otherwise.  

Castro is at .858 versus RHP..so not that crazy a difference.  Add in that Castro is a better defensive catcher..and sitting often keeps Garver rested. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.