Sign in to follow this  
BaseballMuggle

Too much for Nathaniel Lowe

Recommended Posts

5x5 basic roto league 12 teams

 

My first basemen at the moment is Mitch Moreland

 

I have $650 left of my 1000 budget, what would you go on Nate Lowe?

 

I was thinking like 110 or so might get him

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What have similar players gone for?

 

I mean if most hot hitters or prospects are a certain price go by that and add 10%

 

I won him 3 days ago for $74 and got out bid in one league, he went for 81

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Went for 12 in my $100 budget league

 

I like Lowe but not in love with him. I think since your only 1B is Moreland I would go 90 or a hundred dollars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DarinB300 said:

Wouldn't go more than $100. 

 

 

 

Thanks just gave you some help

 

Also wanted to add that Chavis went for $123 last week, that is why I was thinking it might take $100 or touch more

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BaseballMuggle said:

 

Thanks just gave you some help

 

Also wanted to add that Chavis went for $123 last week, that is why I was thinking it might take $100 or touch more

Ah, okay. If he helps your team, it's worth it to get your guy. Just have to be sure you have $$ leftover for other guys. Thanks!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.