DZaak

Established Members
  • Content Count

    1,428
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

159 Excellent

About DZaak

  • Rank
    Superstar

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Australia

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

837 profile views
  1. KAT = serious shut down risk Kawhai = Load Management Which one do you take in a one for one trade? NOTE: I own KAT and am big man heavy (J Collins/Bryant/D Powell in a 16 teamer)
  2. Do you think I have a shot at Huerter instead of Lee?
  3. Collins = consistency while PG = big explosions of points but also some lower lows.. and rest risk. Based on playing it safe, I'd take Collins.
  4. First of all looking at my sig, my team looks bad. I've been decimated with injuries and forced to drop Isaac and Conley just to keep my head above water. So with Thomas Bryant coming back, I have too many C's. With a healthy front line of KAT/Collins/Bryant, I won't need Powell. Does this trade work for me if i offer Powell for Damion Lee? Lee looks like the real deal for ROS. And Powell is putting up good enough numbers that the Lee owner should be interested.
  5. Very nice. I'm joking with my brother to trade him my Collins for his Jokic straight up lol.
  6. fking BS. Just about to get Collins back and this happens. I have Bryant on IR as well. I drafted thinking I had the best big man line up in my league but I've been so weak instead.
  7. One more thing. After my whole rant about load mgmt... I'm still holding Conley wtf. I'm just trying to put out a bunch of trade offer for now. all declined or left for the proposal to expire. For your reference to all owners looking to trade him away... I'm in a 16-team league with 10 roster slots + 1 IR slot. Declined trades: Conley for Kennard Conley for Tucker Conley for Dejounte Conley for Schroder (someone on this thread said they were offered this by Schroder owner so thought i'd try even though it is an obv decline). Conley for J richardson (obv decline but J-rich is super buy low Playing extremely badly) Trades pending reply: Conley for Ball (this owner is 1st in the standings and one of only 3 teams with a free IR spot. This seems like a realistic offer he could accept. But he hasn't bitten yet). Conley for Satoransky Conley for Mclemore (just offered this one 10 minutes ago. honestly not sure if this is a good idea as Mclemore is short term only with Eric Gordon coming back).
  8. It looks like your league settings are perfect to pull this off. Not everyone has that luxury. My league goes off standard waiver priority starting with draft position at the start of the season, then every new waiver used pushes you to the back of the priority. Also we only have one IR slot. Usually thats good enough, but this is just one of those seasons. Almost every team in my league has a long term injury in the IR.
  9. what's the deal with Ibaka? Is this a sell high moment? Or is what he doing sustainable? I just got offered him and his recent numbers look very nice but i'm skeptical.
  10. Conley out for weeks, and looks like he'll be load managed when he comes back anyway. Ingles might have good ROS value even if Conley is healthy due to load management. Holmes is the drop
  11. Yes I agree. keep what you have. Kemba is so good and your trading Collins jsut when he's about to come back? What a waste of you holding him. This trade would have been more acceptable 4 weeks ago.
  12. Conley is basically a drop these days (looks like he will be load managedthe rest of the season). I say do it.
  13. Aldridge is the most dependable player in the trade. I'd take that side based on high floor. Morant will be load managed though, but he's not the headliner in this trade. I say take it.
  14. Should I take this trade. I love having the league leader in blocks, but looking purely at the numbers it seems like a good trade for me, because it's a 16 Team (10 roster slots) league. I don't know much about Ibaka's outlook though. I'm high on Dejounte now that he is starting, but there's stil lrisk there too.
  15. Not sure where the upside is now that it is clear he should be load managed.