Established Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by colepenhagen

  1. rarely veto but an 0-7 team has no chance to make playoffs and if he really was trying to make a push for playoffs he would have trade bell weeks ago. easy veto. sucks for guy making a smart deal but that ruins the integrity of the league
  2. anybody think hes safe enough to play if you have no ivory/ other Monday night options? (only other option I have with byes is ty Montgomery ppr ha)
  3. so looks like hes a must sit unless you own ivory. cant gamble on if he will play on monday
  4. only concern is health and I think that's factored in a bit with a 4th rd pick if you knew you were getting 200 inn out of him you would take him in the late 2nd/early 3rd
  5. id gamble on bell if my team is good/had rb depthand all I had to give up is chubb
  6. 12 team 1 pt ppr seem like a good gamble that the hammy holds up? only reason im thinking about it is because I have eckler. my teams good and I am lock for post season (no payouts for most pts or finishing 1st so only think about playoffs) I have no depth at rb with only barkley cmc with eckler, barber and Ronald jones flex is filled with plenty of good wr's
  7. agree... he is what julio should be (julio should actually be better with his speed)
  8. Bills coach Sean McDermott said LeSean McCoy will practice Thursday but remains in the concussion protocol. Advice: While he remains in the protocol, a practice this early in the week great sign for McCoy's availability on Monday night. Barring any setbacks, he should be cleared ahead of Monday night's game against the Patriots.
  9. yea mahome is #1 qb and he gets on avg weeks 35-40 pts last 2 games 45+pts Rodgers last couple weeks 45pts dak on good weeks is 25+pts (one weeks high of 35 pts) hill on his 2 big weeks is at 42 and 48 pts couple 20 pt weeks and a couple 12-15 pt weeks so the numbers suggest I should do it but I agree its not ideal to put on my eggs in one basket on Rodgers incase he gets inj. what about if it was for mahomes or brees?
  10. 12 team 1 pt ppr 2 qb 3wr 2rb flex teams really good and looking to make a move to really put me over. scoring favors qbs . give hill and dak get rodgers 6 pt pass td bonus pts for 40 yd pass rush and rec tds (2 pts) 0.1 per completion (every 30 completions is 3 extra pts.) 1 pt at 300 yds, 3 pts at 350 yds, 5 pts at 400 yds bonus pts for rush/rec are same for 100/150/200 yds can I win the whole thing with Winston and dak as my 2 qbs (im 6-1) qb dak qb winston wr tyrek hill wr ty hilton wr tate rb barkley rb cmc te kelce flex gordon bench- edelmen, eckler, alf Morris, barber, ro jones
  11. any news if he has a chance to play this week?
  12. doesn't really matter as you are getting value where you likely drafted him (outside top 60 in competitive league) hes shown he can produce while avging 26 min post AS breal with 15/11 2.6 stocks now if he doesn't get 25 min then I will be pissed
  13. gobert finished 30th last year 3+ blks/steals and 11 reb 62%fg 19th 2 years ago. 14pts 13 reb 65% fg and 3+ blks/steals if allen hits any of those I would be surprised and I like/own allen
  14. yes. and you need to send them out today as the bye week for them Is next week so if it is minor then ecklet trade value returns to little. (offered eckler and dt for Hilton and eckler and dak for brady in 2 qb league) I think that would be the best approach to get an upgrade somewhere. could the hammy inj be more serious and eckler gains trade value? sure but for the price eckler costed if you can get a nice upgrade now I would take it
  15. nothing has changed. everyone knew he was healthy when they drafted the question is will he stay healthy? that inj risk/history still bumps him down to late 1st for me. as a kawhi owner I think I would flip him for dipo or pg13 if I had the chance (both went before kawhi/pick 12)
  16. good glue guy that isn't going to hurt you anywhere. hes my starting pg in one of my punt ft teams
  17. it seems impossible for embid to finish higher than kat because of the t/o and %'s (embids % aren't bad but no where near KAT)