jfazz23

Established Members
  • Content Count

    7,649
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2,490 Excellent

About jfazz23

  • Rank
    Hall of Famer

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

5,379 profile views
  1. well that sucks. and i hope everything turns out well for you
  2. so 80 patients in a high infection/critical unit....and 78 recovered because of (most likely because of) hcq/a. 97.5% recovery in 5 days for people on the drug. we should ignore it right??? ALSO. im hearing reports that a doctor in NY has treated 659 patients with the drug and only a handful of complications and all but 5 recovered. will post link when available. but in the meantime, lets keep pushing media hysteria....thats always the smart option
  3. yes by people like Tony and a handful of others here who consistently laugh at me. this is not even as bad as the flu.
  4. HCQ working like a charm. new 80 patient study in France. more "anecdotal evidence" i guess 😁 https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-IHU-2-1.pdf "We need an effective treatment to cure COVID-19 patients and to decrease the virus carriage duration. In 80 in-patients receiving a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin we noted a clinical improvement in all but one 86 year-old patient who died, and one 74 yearold patient still in intensive care unit. A rapid fall of nasopharyngeal viral load tested by qPCR was noted, with 83% negative at Day7, and 93% at Day8. Virus cultures from patient respiratory samples were negative in 97.5% patients at Day5. This allowed patients to rapidly de discharge from highly contagious wards with a mean length of stay of five days. We believe other teams should urgently evaluate this cost-effective therapeutic strategy, to both avoid the spread of the disease and treat patients as soon as possible before severe respiratory irreversible complications take hold."
  5. fact checking sites are political organizations. who checks the fact checker? cope they were citing Imperial university. id post CNN article if they actually reported it...
  6. the media (propaganda) and politically motivated organizations have been pissing on our legs and telling us its raining. difference between you and me is i pop them in the mouth, you grab an umbrella
  7. uk locked down just 2 days ago....yea, thats why it went down from 500k to less than 20k. totally
  8. no, its their job to be prepared. some of them are politically motivated as well...and the media often over hypes whats happening in hospitals. we arent at a shortage of ICU beds or things of that nature. we are really only seeing the elderly and people with pre-existing conditions hurt. plus, the HCQ/A thing seems to work VERY well. italy was hit so hard because they have socialized/government controlled healthcare (inferior to Americas) and an aging population with pre existing conditions. we should have handled this like sweden. basically encouraged the sick and elderly to stay home, and everyone else business as usual. its looking to be not even as bad as Swine flu in 2009/2010...where we did just this (under dr fauci's recommendation) also lol at Tonys coping mechanism. i didnt believe them because i thought they were politically motivated, and it looks like ive be proven correct.
  9. early june latest. maybe may if they are back in camp at end of april. even doomsday pushers like UK imperial college (and some ppl here) are starting to admit this. Imperial college who predicted 500k deaths in england now predicting 20k orMUCH lower. who predicted a year out of school/work now saying 2 weeks. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/imperial-college-scientist-who-predicted-500k-coronavirus-deaths-in-uk-revises-to-20k-or-less the zombie apocalypse pushers were wrong and this is probably not even as serious as the FLU at this point. i expect the country to be back to work in a couple more weeks edit: also, if you are into traveling, i just bought plane tickets to Colorado in june for $85 round trip (from NY area).
  10. im gonna step out of this one. someone jump in as my replacement b4 draft starts thanks
  11. WHO leader was elected with OVERWHELMING backing by the communist chinese government. now hes covering up chinese lies and pushing chinese propoganda. just look at this tweet from WHO. lmao. "WHO does NOT recommend any specific health measures..." edit: here is a little more about how WHO handled corona virus. just lol if you take them seriously
  12. Oxford now reporting infection Fatality rate of 0.19% which probably makes it less dangerous than the Flu. this i nothing more than media hysteria...or is this anecdotal evidence too https://www.cebm.net/global-covid-19-case-fatality-rates/ Our current best assumption, as of the 22nd March, is the IFR is approximate 0.19% (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.24).*
  13. they push chinese propaganda and people cite them....then criticize actual science French studies that have been peer reviewed....sigh
  14. again its not anecdotal evidence. its been shown in scientific studies and peer reviewed publications. the sample size IS small, but also very encouraging. the standard of evidence he is requiring is NOT his job as a scientist. its a wild exaggeration unsuited for the situation. and my contention is that he has other motives...i guess we will just wait and see until more doctors/hospitals start using it next week. lenox hill is very promising, and the science is NOT anecdotal. out
  15. im gonna step out of this thread and watch a movie. stay safe everyone. ^^^yet his rhetoric was SOOO much different during H1N1....hmmm. the french study is NOT completely worthless because a couple of cherry picked doctors said so. the results of lenox hill (and other places) are solid indicators of what this drug can do.