Tale of Two Fisters

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

48 Excellent

About Tale of Two Fisters

  • Rank

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?

Recent Profile Visitors

2,651 profile views
  1. I've only seen that he's isolating because of contact with a teammate who tested positive. Have you found more information?
  2. Yes, you need to have drafted/created a team to see the Players section. If you want to look before you draft, just create a temporary league for yourself to get access.
  3. Coming from someone who relies on making my own rankings since I have to autodraft at times, the pre-draft rankings are messed up. The rankings in the pre-draft area are different than the players area, and I have no idea why. The solution is simple - make your own rankings from scratch. If you don't, it will draft based on the rankings in the 'pre-draft' area, but I've never tested it as I would never use Yahoo's rankings when I can make my own. Take the time to do it and you'll be happy you did.
  4. I think the confusion with Yahoo ranks is between the pre-season rank and the 'rank' given in the pre-draft rankings, which are screwy. What I see: Mondesi: pre-season rank 69 draft 'rank' 239 I have to autodraft in some leagues so I spend plenty of time in the pre-draft rankings area, and those rankings have no logic to what they are in the players list.
  5. Does anyone here play in deep, redraft leagues, say 20 teams? I've read people saying that at SP, there's a top tier or two (depending on how you split your tiers, of course) and then there's a large group with many similar starters. I wonder if it's beneficial to grab a starter within the first two rounds (top 40), or by the third at latest? I haven't gone into much depth yet for my draft strategy, but interested to hear from those in deeper leagues how they're approaching SP's this season.
  6. I've seen this as well, if you go to 'draft analysis ' on Yahoo. Seems like an outlier, perhaps caused by limited drafts being conducted so far and someone overreaching him. I'm sure this will change over time.
  7. I don't post much but I do read quite a bit on these forums, and I just want to say that this has been a very useful discussion so far. It's very interesting reading the variety of opinions on players/strategy, and for someone who doesn't follow/analyse/project players as actively as many of you, it's helpful for me at this stage of the offseason. I am aware of the earlier conversation about choosing to do this mock on the forums rather than on fantrax, in order to facilitate more valuable discussions as they progress. As someone who cannot join these mocks, reading the ongoing discussion thread adds so much more value. Thanks, and good luck the rest of the mock.
  8. In my experience, a weekly moves limit is more accurately described as a matchup moves limit. So, if the matchup is 11 days, then the moves limit applies for that period.
  9. Thanks, yeah I have thought of that as well, just could be difficult to find adequate streaming options in this deep a league. Thanks, yeah I have no intention of dropping anyone as I need the depth (as mentioned in my reply above). It's simply to use one of my excess RP to pick up one of those starters. Marquez seems to be the favourite, so it comes down to burning the waiver to get him or risk waiting for him to clear. Yep, regardless definitely need a trade! To everyone, I know that at least one other manager is in a similar boat as myself, so I wonder if he'll put in a claim for Marquez. He's #19 so could be a low risk move to claim.
  10. Thanks for the feedback. Yep definitely hoping to make a trade as well - we'll see what can get done. Thanks for the feedback. I'm not dumping any other starters as I still need the depth, so would be dropping an excess RP. Would you suggest a waiver claim (#1) like the above poster or wait until FA?
  11. Hey all,Just drafted (well, unfortunately had to autodraft and pre-ranked) in a one year, 20 team roto league. I would guess that around 100-120 starting pitchers have been drafted. My pitching turned out quite weak so having a look at the scraps on waivers to see if worth grabbing someone who has a chance at sneaky value this season (really all I can ask for at this stage). I have the #1 waiver so it really has to be worth it or save it and hope they go unclaimed. In a vacuum, would you claim (or pick up from FA) one of these guys, and please rank your second best as well. I would appreciate reasons for your selection(s) as I'm not up to speed on them:Tyler AndersonNate KarnsBrandon McCarthyJosh TomlinGerman MarquezBrandon FinneganMartin PerezIt's a 6x6 format - pitching cats are W,K,ERA,WHIP, plus SV and HLD. I've also posted on the league page for possible trades to improve my starting pitching. My current staff:ClevingerPeacock (who's likely relieving for now)GoharaFoltynewiczThat's it. I usually like at least 5 SP to start and since Peacock likely isn't starting, this needs fixing. I was given an extra two RP, one of which I won't need so would drop to make room for a SP. I might drop Caleb Joseph as well since I have Russell Martin but that would be a secondary option.Thanks in advance. If there is any other information I haven't included, just ask.
  12. Yep there's a lot of turnover so it's deciding whether worth the risk on a guy that I feel is secure, or just wait for the later rounds. Or balance with perceived security and then risk later. Using that Shaw/Miller example, aside from saves+holds, Miller was better in K, ERA and WHIP. So Miller was actually better to use across the board. I don't plan on focusing too much on the saves+holds aspects all the time, as the other categories are important. And as you mentioned (which I'll touch on below), holds guys can change a lot during the season other than most of the top set up guys. Regarding the 'stronger teams' part of my post, I wasn't just saying that generally. I was mentioning it in context to a H2H league, where the window is smaller and figured the odds that a better team will have more wins in that week, I might get more saves+holds by using a tandem on that team. Sure, the Indians could win 5 games all by more than 3 runs and I won't get anything that week. Whereas, the Marlins may win twice and get saves in both. I understand that, and have known that in the past several years. The focus was on the weekly window and maybe it's worth going after a stronger tandem rather than a weaker one. As you touched on about getting guys to complement each other (low K with high K), I do feel that in a H2H with saves+holds, getting strong K guys could be the difference. The ERA/WHIP could be volatile on a weekly basis and even if the reliever doesn't get a hold/save, if he's a strong K guy then he'll help that week. Yep, I try to keep an eye on some changing roles e.g. seeing who's now getting into the game in the 7th with the team winning, whereas before was going into the 5th/6th with them losing.
  13. What part is wrong? My point above was referring to the top closers, not all closers. Yes I agree, given that a save is equal to a hold, is doesn't matter as much who gets them, but when looking at the other categories on top of that (need to look beyond just saves/holds), then the top closers give you the most strength across the board. Then, I asked the question about the better holds guys (with strong other categories) vs lower saves guys (with not as strong other categories). Guys like Miller etc. will be very valuable and probably will be taken above several closers, just not the top ones. About your point 2 - yep that's part of my plan as I expect to be able to get solid RP's later on in the draft. I guess the strategy will be - do I grab one top closer and then wait a bit for other RP, or just go for discounted players? That's just a general question for myself - no need to go into detail as that would make it a 'bench coach forum' type question.