Sweetness09

Members
  • Content Count

    498
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

66 Excellent

About Sweetness09

  • Rank
    Veteran

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yeah same and SF should be tough on Kyler. I’m hoping Lazard has a quiet week and I can pick him up again next week.
  2. Thats what I’m worried about, knowing my luck Lazard will have a great day. But my opponent just had Fuller and Butker do well for him so I feel like I may need every point I can get. It’s a tough one.
  3. Sorry that’s what happens when I post drunk. COOK no S
  4. Really wishing I went with my gut and took CEH over Cook.
  5. Qb: Kyler Rb: Cooks, Conner, Moss, Mattison WR: Adams, Woods, Gallup, Kirk, Lazard I don’t love Kyler’s matchup vs SF and considering dropping Lazard for Roethlisberger to play him Sunday. Good move or should I hang on to Lazard as a cuff for Adams?
  6. Team I’m playing against already dropped 150 on me by the afternoon game and projected most points in our league. Ever.
  7. Getting crushed by Saquon, Lockett and NE D. All players that had been on a downward spiral along with the team I’m playing against until today. Yay.
  8. This is where I’m at too. He’s quietly been the wr11 since week 10.
  9. Struggling here - Deebo has been more consistent with points but Brown has the better matchup and ceiling with the potential to bust. PPR. Thoughts?
  10. Yeah it seems obvious looking at the most recent numbers who to pick but the name value of Russell Wilson vs. Tannehill hinders judgement.
  11. Wilson has been terrible the past few weeks and when I look back he’s really only had 5 great games. He has the potential for a monster game so it’s hard to sit him but Tannehill has been on fire. Am I crazy for considering this in the playoffs?
  12. Same. Started them over PIT D this week and have a feeling I’m going to be kicking myself. Although they never ever got credit for the sack part of the sack/fumble so maybe they’ll get a stat correction.