bluefrogguy

Established Members
  • Content Count

    575
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

263 Excellent

About bluefrogguy

  • Rank
    Allstar

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks. I was a week ahead of the coronavirus thread in the NBA rotoworld board. MLB fans prepare early! Looking back, in the third post on this thread I mentioned option of not playing in front of fans. Broken clock is right twice a day, as they say! (hopefully, anyway).
  2. Even if I envision the season starting, I have a hard time envisioning it not stopping again with a minor outbreak (that may or may not include players).
  3. No doubt. I'm just saying that we are going to start to see the returns this week. and it doesn't look good, especially in NYC. I think other places might show better results.
  4. Yeah I agree we *probably* haven't done a good job. But we are going to see what kind of job we have done since the messaging started this week. Trump's 15 day trial ends the 29th and then he is going to "reevaluate it". 538 reported on a poll of ID experts taken on March16-17 after the social distancing messaging started where they thought we'd be on March 29th. The median was 20,000 cases. with a range of 10K to 75K. We passed the median guess within a week. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/infectious-disease-experts-dont-know-how-bad-the-coronavirus-is-going-to-get-either/
  5. Social distancing messaging started a week and half ago. Heck even Trump started tweeting it the morning of March 14th. That's nine days ago. I think this week will tell a lot of how effective our response has been. Doesn't look good so far.
  6. Yeah I agree, although social distancing messaging started 10 days ago and mass public closings started about a week ago, so we should start to see how well we are doing this week as that is in the 5-9 day time frame. Early returns are not so promising though, tbh.
  7. I think there are demographic differences. But the biggest difference is the timing of response (hopefully). We got to learn from their mistakes. At least hopefully we timed our response better. We'll find out this week.
  8. Definitely needs some wider randomized testing, which should be easy to do right now. If it is effective, it will definitely get a lot of press. But right now it is akin to the proverbial over-hyped, spring training "small sample size" data. Have to be careful until you get good data. I'm also hopeful for some of the antiviral options coming through. Let's go human ingenuity!
  9. Agree with the skepticism, but I also don't dismissing the data out of hand is the right thing to do either. Obviously will need to look at our own data over time to confirm before deciding on the next step to take public health wise. But if it is confirmed and the spread is mostly through close contact (family, social circles and workplace) , that opens up more (and less intrusive) options to mitigate future outbreaks.
  10. I’m more optimistic for the first time in a week that there will be baseball this year. The Chinese data shows that most transmission was between families, social circles and the workplace- I.e. adults spending extended time worth someone shedding the virus. Not as much short exposure transmission and they basically found no school transmission. Public health personnel can work with that transmission pattern in terms of contact tracing and mitigating spread should we get a new local outbreak. Second, is this report about loss of smell and taste that turns out to be pretty common. Still early but if there is a unique sentinel sign of infection to look for, that could be utilized to make people isolate or get tested. And speaking of testing, first rapid, 1 hr TAT tear was approved for emergence use authorization (EUA) by the CDC. Once testing becomes easily available, that will be helpful in surveillance and early diagnosis. Add in the hope that the virus mutates and/or shows some seasonality and we might be able to come up with a public health strategy that removes the restrictions on crowd size. We probably still recommend the at risk from being in big crowds and obviously hand washing and restricting physical contact would continue, but events with lots of attendees like sporting events could be allowed (again, once we are through this acute phase where it is everywhere). Still questions on what would happen with a local outbreak, especially if athletes involved, though. Some kind of treatment breakthrough would obviously be huge. Next two weeks are going to be rough though. Especially in NYC. We are definitely going to stress the limits of our health care system and providers. Those people can’t be appreciated enough.
  11. The best case scenario is that the virus is indeed weather or humidity variable and/or mutates along the way (a lot of viruses mutate and become less pathogenic over time- that's waht happened to some degree with MERS and SARS) and peters out this summer. We make it through this first wave with the extreme measures, maybe a drug come up that is effective too. In that scenario, late summer baseball is possible. Let's hope, anyway.
  12. Yeah influenza A mutates its N and H antigens each year and is tough to predict which combo will predominate. Sometimes the flushot is better than others. Influenza B mutates less and there is some at least partial lifelong immunity. We don't know enough about COVID-19 (aka SARS-2) to know how effective the vaccine will be. On the bummer side, they were never able to develop effective vaccines to SARS-1 and MERS, the two other "bad" coronaviruses, although we are obviously putting a lot more time and energy into this one. We'll have to see in a year.
  13. If there is no season values/salaries should be frozen, I think. Any season at all and they should advance per league rules.
  14. Definitely the worry with COVID-19 and why it has become a pandemic, whereas SARS-1, MERS and Ebola didn't. You could just tell who was sick so much easier. I couldn't find anywhere estimating the % of asymptomatic carriers with COVID-19. But like the death rate, the most important number is the total number of asymptomatic carriers, not the percentage.
  15. This is from the CDC and should answer your questions They use surrogate data and modeling but there are assumptions and limitations they outline. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/how-cdc-estimates.htm One thing they don’t include in the denominator is asymptomatic cases. Like COVId-19 there are a lot of asymptomatic infections. https://www.clinicaladvisor.com/home/web-exclusives/most-flu-cases-asymptomatic/ So if they include asymptomatic contacts for the CoVID 19 denominator that is going to make the death rate appear lower than how they calculate the flu death rate.