Boudewijn

Established Members
  • Content Count

    4,932
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Boudewijn last won the day on August 14 2019

Boudewijn had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2,759 Excellent

1 Follower

About Boudewijn

  • Rank
    On the Ballot

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

3,762 profile views
  1. Happy holidays all. Sorry for being a bit absent in this first season; I'll try to make up for it next year.
  2. I don't come here very often anymore, but I had to post and give @Sternes a fistbump. Merry Christmas, buddy.
  3. I was just typing to complain that I needed only 2 more receptions out of him to sneak undeservedly into the play-offs... and here we are. Yay Nuk. Even when you're not on my team, you save me again.
  4. I'm in three leagues, and the CMC owners are 1, 2 and 3. So, yeah.
  5. I like that Twitter repeats clips like these ad infinitum. I can keep watching this for hours. (Even though I thought Sanchez was fine - this is just too hilarious.)
  6. Slow down there champ I won't pretend I saw that coming, but nevertheless: - Woods: 3/40 - Watkins: 5/64 - Dorsett: 6/53/1 plus 12 yd rushing.
  7. Hi Tony, thanks for the reply. First off, your reply seems a bit defensive, and that was not my intention. I tried to make a positive point, and I hope if you reread my post, you will see that. With that said, I don't fully agree with you , so allow me to nitpick a bit. Yeah, I didn't say that. Train's gonna choo-choo, to paraphrase a popular saying. Clearly those comments are not going to remove themselves. People also raise hell when they start political discussions and you (correctly, I think) remove them. Keep this point in mind, I may come back to it later. Eh yes. That was sort of a comment in the vein of "water is wet". I also agree with your reasons; I disagree that it was a red herring, it was a simple "old man yelling at the sky" comment (and I don't mind you removed it, fair game). This was sort of my point. I think this is a good thing. Yay, we agree First of all, I recognise there is a limited number of mods, and the ideal modding is limited modding. If you guys feel that this is the kind of questions that get out of hand, then those are the questions you don't allow, period. No discussion. This forum is one of the few places where even with high volumes of traffic people generally don't have to feel threatened. We all know the places where the signal-to-insult ratio is way out of hand, and I generally don't see that happening here, so good job. Whoah, wait. What I said originally was not a veiled complaint or insult against the mods. It was simply stating a fact that (for exactly the reasons you mention), peak-season readibility << off-season value. That's just how it is, regardless of whether you have 2 or 200 or 2000 mods. Also, but in a completely unrelated point (almost completely unrelated) I know your resources were stretched, I have no problem with how you're doing it, the new guys are doing a good job too, so please don't get defensive. What I was trying to do in this post here then was not the typical complaint of "this mod suxxz" or "rotoforums are crap" or "in my time when I was young" or anything like that, but rather to take FFCs point, and start a friendly discussion. I'm also not advocating any radical changes. I was just trying to bring up what I thought was a good point; something you guys could discuss in the off-season, to see if that can improve a pretty darn good forum even more. Ignore it for now, and come back to it when you have time to breath again. I don't even pretend to have a ready-made solution, it was just a discussion point. But that point was that if I have to choose between "choo choo" and AC forum questions, then I choose the latter (which is why I try to spend a lot of time there when I have the chance). Thanks for replying, thanks for reading, and keep up the good work.
  8. Get the sleeperbot app on your phone. Never read the conversations, they're more disgusting than any social media you can think of (including the Twitter in Chief), but the news updates are mega useful.
  9. Keenum did pretty good the last couple weeks (600 yards and 5 TD), and the Bears allowed close to 600 yards in the past 2 weeks, including 292 to Flacco. I thought Keenum should at least be able to get 230/1, which is what I needed from him before his pick-6.
  10. OK, can Keenum now please start throwing the 250 yards and 2 TD I need from him?
  11. I'll take the under. Can I book that with you?
  12. I think it's safe to say he's probably thumbing his twixies.
  13. I love how people create a straw man argument based on nothing. At least not based on the posts in this thread.