JPT

He is the one thing holding my team back from being a real contender. And I don't think he will get the consistent 25 points you need from a QB drafted in his position down the stretch. The Eagles WR are not good, and they are a run first team at this point. He'll play well enough to win real world games but he's a low end fantasy QB moving forward.

Thanks for your help. Tough one. I don't think Breida will play all that much. He might take one the distance but I think I would go Drake.

DK, just a better offense.

Maybe Mattison and Hunt would be enough? Probably not but some people may fall in love with the name. I wouldn't give up a WR, you don't have enough depth there and MG on a bad chargers team.

Hock, Fells is TD dependant.

I would pass. Mike Evans can blow up and win you any week. AJG is going to be catching passes from a rookie on a terrible team. Just too big of a potential downgrade.

Adams if he plays, Montgomery and flex Howard.Not scared of Bears run D.

Big risk, Adams may be back this weekend, or he may miss multiple more weeks. Turf toe is a killer. I might still do it, since you have some decent WR depth and could afford to wait a few weeks. If you need the QB upgrade that badly.

So I have the opportunity to trade Carson for Kamara. Carson has been great, but has a tough ROS. Kamara seems more matchup proof. Should I make the move??? Standard scoring league. The reason the deal is on the table is that Kamara can't be kept in our league, but Carson could. The way our rules are set up I wouldn't keep him anyways (keeping Jacobs and Mike Thomas most likely).

I would do it, Golladay becomes your WR2 and the guys you're trading away are injury risks.

I like the players you got back better than what you gave up. I'm a Singletary believer, even if he splits with Gore ROS he'll be a nice keeper. Sutton is going to be consistent and better than Stills most weeks.

Yeah, Lockett is worth the 2 for 1.

I wouldn't trade CMC. Maybe it's a fair deal, but I wouldn't do it

I would take a shot on Henderson getting enough work to take the RB spot. The other choice is tough....I might honestly start Parker over everyone else with Fitzmagic.

This upgrades your QB spot in a big way, and bottom line someone on your bench is not helping your team win games. But...Jacobs is a really valuable piece with a good schedule for the rest of the season. I might rather upgrade at WR not knowing when/if Adams will be back. If you can get a studly WR I would rather do that. Otherwise I would make the trade.

Mack is the exact type of back that you could hope to get. Lindsay in that same range. Maybe a Gurley or Connor, but that would be lucky.

Absolutely I would do this. Beckham may not be a top 5 WR this season, but he will get a lot of targets and I think the Browns will get better. Woods is competing for targets.

I say yes as well, they'll be good ROS and you won't have to worry about that spot anymore. Plus who else would you really get that would be starting most weeks?

So I can swing a deal for Godwin, sending Chris Carson. Wanted to get thoughts, WHIR. It's standard scoring. In my league flex can only be WR or TE, so starting only 2 RB each week. QB: Wentz RB: Jacobs/Carson/Sony/Edmonds/Singletary/Jamal Williams WR: Hopkins/Thomas/John Brown/Crowder TE: Fells/Herndon So I can essentially roll with a WR1 in all 3 spots if I make this deal, play Jacobs as my RB1 and then play the other RB spot week to week. Thoughts? I know I could use an upgrade at TE or QB also.

Why is everyone so surprised that there is nothing new. He has turf toe, expect for him to be out multiple additional weeks, he may not be right for the rest of the season.

Probably 50/50. If he does what he did the first couple of games he'll probably get sightly more. But never have to carry the full load.

I have on offer on the tablet to trade Jacobs, and get OBJ. I think better days ahead for Beckham but I don't think I'm going to pull the trigger.

While its due to bye weeks I'm starting him against the Giants with confidence. Rainy and windy in Foxborough, seems like the game script will favor the Pats running all over the Giants as much as they can. Always risk with NE rb'sm but I'm hoping for 80-100 total yards and a TD.

Thanks for your help. I can't see your sig here either, but that sounds like a good deal if you need starters at both positions.

You're right not to include Kupp, guy is a stud. I might do the Adams for MGIII deal if he were to accept it. Turf toe is a problem for the rest of the season. He may not want to take that risk. Otherwise I'm thinking there will be a share with Ekeler for MGIII and I don't know how much better than Carson he'll be ROS. I might stay put.