Jump to content
Rotoworld.com Forums

LarryDavid

Members
  • Content Count

    438
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LarryDavid

  1. They don't even need Jmart for DH, they have Dom Smith if the NL DH is available. They just resigned him cheap too, a little over 2 mil to not go to arbitration. After his .300 shorten season I thought that was really nice for them.
  2. I'm guessing you didn't see any of tonights line yet.
  3. Cmac, Kamara and Gibby for me.. pretty easy too. I love Jrob as much as many, I drafted him in two of my leagues this year, but the price and production would go Gibson.
  4. Yeah you can't have thighs that look like that AND be the actual starter. This forum will be going batshit with hype if that's the case.
  5. Nah, I really don't even think he's that great of a player. He is an above average vision back that has monstrous size. I just think if Vegas had a line for who the leading back will be for the Packers with only Jamaal Williams and AJ Dillon, I think it would be like -450 for Dillion. I am just talking common sense with about where he is drafted and his size. This is of course in addition to looking very solid last night. This is also with the Packers knowing exactly what they have in the hypothetical scenario that they do resign Williams. He has gotten some bigger usage with Jones out in the
  6. Not really sure why most wouldn't keep him regardless, I couldn't name 12 other starters I would rather him. I know the risk with injury or whatever but people almost forget his CY Young season that was only two seasons ago. If the Padres let him at least go 6-7 innings in games, which I would imagine they will, he's going to be a top 8 pitcher to me in any format.
  7. If they do resign Williams.. AJ won't be "taking on the Williams role". Williams would be staying in the Williams role. The guy is a horse and the Packers drafted him in the 2nd to be the man. I love Jones and think he's great with Arod, but they are letting him walk and this dude is going to be the lead back.
  8. I'd still keep OBJ over Juedy and Chark might be reallllly nice with Trevor Lawerence.
  9. Hurts is brining home fantasy championships today. 4 total TDs in a 35 point masterpiece coming up
  10. Yeah I’m not so sure about that. Carr is not good. His stat line have looked pretty solid in a few games, but I think it’s very misleading in comparison to watching every game. He had one solid game agains the Chiefs earlier this year when they were red hot, besides that they haven’t been good. He is a smart QB. He knows how to operate Gruden’s system, making checks and get them into a good play, mostly running the ball. But the dude really can stretch the field at all and he’s conservative to a fault and it gets so ugly. I could see that continuing for him vs a Flores D. Carr’s play
  11. I was really hoping Carr sat. At less than full health, he’s going to be brutal.
  12. Again, it isn't fear. It is logically thinking if it would actually make enough sense to sit guys given the Chiefs current circumstances, and planning ahead if possible since it is waiver night in most leagues. I don't plan on sitting my Chiefs and I sure as hell hope there is no rumblings of sitting anyone all week. It is the championship week, so no stone left unturned for me.
  13. I don’t think anyone is saying they are benching any of those guys. It’s Tuesday. I don’t want it to happen and I don’t think it should. But point of this discussion is valid.. not that you should panic. But just in the sense that you should plan ahead just in case. Also, this is the rare time where a coach has been in this exact situation and done the exact thing we are fearing. So think what you want about the hypotheticals, but I’m not being caught with my tail between my legs come Sunday morning.
  14. I’ll repeat myself from last page.. because Andy does “play that bs stuff”. From your logo, you’re an Eagles fan though.. so I guess you’d also remember. In 2004, the Eagles coached by Andy Reid clinched the #1 NFC seed with 2 games remaining. In Week 16, Reid played the starters on the opening series of the game (the Eagles scored a touchdown on that series) but pulled the starters after that. He also rested the Eagles' starters in their Week 17 game. The Eagles won the NFC championship that season.
  15. In 2004, the Eagles coached by Andy Reid clinched the #1 NFC seed with 2 games remaining. In Week 16, Reid played the starters on the opening series of the game (the Eagles scored a touchdown on that series) but pulled the starters after that. He also rested the Eagles' starters in their Week 17 game. The Eagles won the NFC championship that season. Sooo I’d say based off that, it’s not looking good. Especially after they just lost Clyde this last week. Andy Reid that same year lost T.O. in week 15, that’s partly why he pulled the week 16 & 17 deal. Sucks to have rode the Mahomes
  16. Foot injury played a huge role outside of the terrible game. He also had a 25 yard TD called back on a hold, and another 25 yard run on a backside clipping call. Woulda, coulda, shoulda.. but two penalties away from limping into 120+ and a toudy
  17. Without looking I’d guess Vegas would have him at his O/U on catches at like 7.. and I would bet my house on the over.
  18. Yes he was better because he had 7 catches compared to the 2 and 1 catch games before. But a still rib cage tender Brees would be very nice. They wouldn’t have Brees back unless he was healthy enough to be effective.. but he also wouldn’t want to be getting smacked, so a 9 catch type game would be on the dockett for this dude.
  19. Lol Jesus man... can the guys trotting out Logan Thomas, Irv Smith, and Cole Kmet this week with Kittle on the IR at least dream??
  20. I really think I’m going Hilton and Dobbins here. Close but I like the matchups for both the most and trending up
  21. Standard scoring. I know this is a good problem to have but it’s always scary in the Semi’s. Cam Akers vs Jets or Calvin Ridley vs Bucs
  22. A Shanahan offense, even as beat up as it is, still is no where as s---y as the current Bengals.
  23. The play swung gambling lines for sure because it was -3/-3.5 going into the game, so that played covered for the Ravens. But for fantasy it still never showed anything negative for Landry. I think they scored it as a fumble recovery for him
  24. I’m debating two decent options, but I think they are super close. These ones scare the **** out of me knowing it could be the difference. Bills D @ Broncos or Browns D @ Giants on SNF I think the Browns have to be tired coming off that slugfest last night and have to travel. Outside Garret too they aren’t all that talented
×
×
  • Create New...