confusedmrkrabs

Members
  • Content Count

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by confusedmrkrabs

  1. That is the first pick of the 10th, and no, in drafts with 15-16 rounds that is a mid-round pick... regardless it's nowhere near a 14th round pick and is an irrelevant talking point...
  2. It isn't... again... read... the analysis is of every position... you can easily see it for the others... it breaks it down for WR relative to RB ON THE WR PAGE I LINKED...
  3. I understand this... I have minimal faith in Dez... just think he's the best upside guy at WR that late...
  4. They don't pan out relative to other positions... I literally provided a link to the site that completely broke down numbers by tiers by round by position... regardless... you're not disproving my original point at all... Dez has upside unmatched by other WRs going in the 14th round...
  5. Thanks for your 2 examples...lol...and Thielen was a mid-rounder at an ADP of 109 anyway so...no...most of them don't pan out...go look at some statistics before posting your falsities... https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/articles/fantasy-football-studying-the-positional-draft-value-of-wrs/ Dez is like a 14th rounder...so no...he has upside that isn't matched by the likes of Mohamed Sanu...let me know how Jordan Matthews worked out for you last year...and John Brown...and Rishard Matthews...and Corey Davis...and Ted Ginn...
  6. I'm probably down to draft him... late... if he gets signed and is motivated it could pay off in a major way... especially since late round WRs usually don't produce useful numbers anyway...
  7. Yeah... it isn't... but this has more to do with Ingram so let's just move on...
  8. Not if Payton continues using running backs the way he has for the last 12 years...
  9. It's not usually a terrible thing...if there are 2 good fantasy RBs on a team (there are usually about 2 teams with this every year) then a. they're obviously startable (like Kamara and Ingram, or Freeman and Coleman) and b. the #2 guy is usually undervalued in drafts because of the faulty logic that guy posted...
  10. ... You are LITERALLY replying to the post where I explain...
  11. Because the Giants have one of the worst offensive lines in the league and the Cowboys had by far the best line in the league...you cannot cite Zeke to prop up Barkley... the situations don't compare at all... lazy posting...
  12. They were also both 9th rounders so that doesn't mean much...
  13. I think those people were dumb and wrong... I've owned Gurley the past 2 years... Gordon is a good back... but he's not as good as... basically any RB going in the top 20 imo... but again... doesn't matter... his situation is great... he could easily be a top 2 RB by the end of the year...
  14. It's not crazy... just dumb...their ceilings are the same at best... Johnson's floor is obviously higher...
  15. I don't see him finishing in front of Gurley... and he's just not as good as the guys in front of him...but his situation could hardly be better... I have him as RB5-6 as well...
  16. If you think he's a better player than David Johnson then draft him in front of him... otherwise take a seat...
  17. How you can possibly think an improved offense is bad for Howard is beyond me...
  18. @CyberneticGhostOfXMasPast you know what the purpose of those posts was... joshua's argument was terrible... stop being deliberately obtuse...
  19. The point... of course... before this guy tried to derail yet another thread... is that Johnson is a proven elite RB... Barkley isn't... and plenty of elite RB prospects bust...taking Barkley over Johnson would simply be dumb... which is why there's a whopping 1 person arguing the case even in Barkley's thread...
  20. Not only was Carter not a great receiver... he was not a great receiver when it didn't matter if RBs could catch or not... so @joshua18's argument makes 0 sense... obviously Carter was a top flight RB prospect...
  21. Can't shoot though, so according to you he's a terrible prospect
  22. Sure... and Wilt Chamberlain was a terrible prospect... it's as if he never worked on his jumper...
  23. Lol... yeah... it was 20 years ago... this doesn't refute his point at all...
  24. But that didn't happen last year... and the team is just as good... and the line is just as good... so again... why would you expect anything different... sure if the Saints get shut out you'll probably lose...but they won 11 games and have one of the best teams in the league... nonsensical reasons to write off Ingram...
  25. Lol... plenty of teams have had 2 RBs finish in the Top 20...if you won't take Ingram in the 5th round for that reason... sounds like a personal problem... but we're getting off track...