TomPe

Members
  • Content Count

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About TomPe

  • Rank
    Triple-A

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Get Embiid, especially that it is roto + pretty shallow league (9 teams as I understand from your signature), so there should be some pretty decent pickup on the waivers.
  2. Jrue + Bryant makes sense imo, I would try to wait until Embiid strings together 4-5 great matches with no rest days and try to get Jrue + someone better than Bryant for Embiid. Philly has lot of B2B in March, come the playoffs time and I expect NOP to get better and fight for a playoff spot.
  3. Thanks, appreciate your feedback. I will not reveal the palyers' names yet not to bias others who may throw their 2 cents on that, but I can tell you that A1 is a borderline all-star and A2 by any manner is not and in C1 vs C2 (this is actually few players for few players) there is one all-star on both sides. And here is the thing - trades A1 for A2 and B1 for B2 were not vetoed and C1 vs C2. C1 vs C2 was my trade, where I needed PTS, 3PM and FT% and the other manager needed stocks and rebounds + he was getting 2 C eligible players to replace his crappy and only 2 Cs (Dedmon, Baynes) on the roster was vetoed. Quite odd, right?
  4. Can you elaborate a bit on how you view C2 way much better than C1? The stats are worse for C2 in FG%, FT%, REB, STL, BLK and TOs and better only in 3PM, PTS and AST, so I am interested in the rationale behind that. This is a seasoned league, the same managers for around last 6-7 years.
  5. Hey there, I'm in 9-cat roto league and a bit frustrated with vetoing some trades and allowing other trades to proceed, so want to get your feedback/opinion on whether it is only me or you guys also feel this is a bit odd ... Below are three recent trades (A1 vs A2, B1 vs B2, C1 vs C2, I want to keep it anonimuous so that noone is biased by names) in my league - some of them went through, some were blocked. I wonder which set of statistics would you choose (A1 or A2, B1 or B2, C1 or C2) and whether you think any of these (and which one, if any) trades should be vetoed? FGA FGM FG% FTA FTM FT% 3PM PTS REB AST STL BLK TO A1 14.83 8.33 0.5618 4.33 4.00 0.9231 1.67 20.00 6.33 5.83 0.83 0.50 2.67 A2 11.17 5.50 0.4925 4.83 3.33 0.6897 1.17 15.50 4.67 1.83 0.50 0.50 1.83 B1 7.33 2.67 0.3636 1.00 0.83 0.8333 1.50 7.67 6.67 3.00 0.50 1.33 2.50 B2 19.67 8.00 0.4068 8.33 7.17 0.8600 1.67 24.83 4.50 6.50 0.50 0.50 2.67 C1 8.64 4.09 0.4737 1.45 1.18 0.8125 0.64 10.00 6.82 2.18 1.09 1.18 0.91 C2 17.63 8.25 0.4681 4.75 3.63 0.7632 2.50 22.63 3.50 4.00 0.88 0.25 2.75
  6. Rockets aren’t known for their great defence nevertheless, I am very happy with the trade, think it’s a win win situation for both.
  7. Wizards were not THAT bad last 2 years, that’s the point
  8. Hope you’re right. I’m a bit concerned that Beal will get rested as well as Wizards are bad, but we will see.
  9. I know, but Draymond and Holmes can start smashing now ... still, I think it’s an upgrade for my team and at the same time an upgrade for his as he will not need to roster Len or Dedmon anymore
  10. So I have a trade offer on the table: His Beal for my Draymond, Holmes and PJ. Would you accept? Am I not giving up too much?
  11. RJ is killing your %, doesn’t block, turns the ball over a lot and is not great at any stat. Holmes is a double double machine with good % and stocks. I agree there is some risk with Walton or bagley coming back from his injury, but the upside is very high and I would rather have Holmes than RJ as with holmes you may enjoy 3rd round value ROS and with RJ you get max 8th if he ups his % and takes better care of the ball, which i seriously doubt.
  12. Stick with Holmes. There is a high possibility he will continue to smash, even with Walton as a head coach and after Bagley’s return. The upside is too much, we are potentially talking about 3rd round value for Holmes. Any thoughts on my question?