Sign in to follow this  
rquinlan

Burkhead or Mike Davis?

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Tribe Called Questionable said:

I have this same problem.. White was on the field a lot last week and we know Lewis will be involved..

 

I think most people will still say Burkhead but I may be leaning towards Davis at the moment

I agree with you. Davis owns the backfield right now. Burkhead's usage is alarming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Burkhead has a way higher chance of scoring. Ignore the volume factor and consider the fact that a Seattle RB still hasn't scored a rushing TD this year (I think). Go with Rex

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same issue but eventually dropped davis... don't think you can trust any seattle RB at this moment

 

I'm going with burkhead this week too

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same exact spot.....Leaning Davis at the time being

 

....Afraid NE could be playing catchup again which last week showed Burkhead was no where to be found 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Burkhead. The yardage production for each may be about equal (with Rex splitting carries with White and the Seahawks run game just being very mediocre), but Burkhead will almost certainly get a few goal line looks and thus has a much better chance at a TD.

 

http://forums.rotoworld.com/topic/689052-fournette-out-replacement/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.