smeeze

Aaron Jones 2018 Outlook

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Corleone said:

 

But if the opposing team has a solid pass rush, you would think GB would say "let's utilize the running game" and "let's throw quick passes to Jones when he's wide-open, before the pocket has completely collapsed". 

 

I hear ya. But Rodgers was laser focused on Adams.

 

All.

Night.

Long.

 

Lionel Richie?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Corleone said:

 

But if the opposing team has a solid pass rush, you would think GB would say "let's utilize the running game" and "let's throw quick passes to Jones when he's wide-open, before the pocket has completely collapsed". 

 

Amongst other options...yes.    Rodgers had open guys short almost every pass play and he just didn’t see them.   Poor performance- he was throwing tantrums all night.   If you don’t trust WRs to make simple 5-8 yard receptions...they shouldn’t be on the field.  

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Impreza178 said:

 

Amongst other options...yes.    Rodgers had open guys short almost every pass play and he just didn’t see them.   Poor performance- he was throwing tantrums all night.   If you don’t trust WRs to make simple 5-8 yard receptions...they shouldn’t be on the field.  

Yeah I'm hoping the QB coach or someone sits him down and points out all the dump-off's he could have taken.  Dump to an elite RB like this and there is a good chance he can make someone miss.  Do like Brady does just pass it 1-2 yards to White and let him generate all your passing yards after the catch.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, lla887 said:

 

Good game for Rogers fantasy wise but bad footballwise.  He choked when they needed him which is the opposite of the Rogers we are used to

 

9 hours ago, Bish0p said:

Did you watch the game? Or did you just check the box score? Honest question.

 

I was responding to the following post

 

9 hours ago, Bish0p said:

Solid game by Jones IN SPITE of McCarthy/Rodgers.  Imagine if he had a competent coach and a QB that wasn’t slumping.

 

"Oh imagine if aaron jones didn't have to play with the burdensome rodgers"

 

get some perspective guys. aaron jones has a generational qb in the backfield with him. and you are complaining about it.

 

wow it really sucks that the RB i drafted in the middle rounds is blowing up and has to deal with having arguably the greatest qb of his generation 

Edited by Cotton Jones
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Cotton Jones said:

 

 

I was responding to the following post

 

 

"Oh imagine if aaron jones didn't have to play with the burdensome rodgers"

 

get some perspective guys. aaron jones has a generational qb in the backfield with him. and you are complaining about it.

 

wow it really sucks that the RB i drafted in the middle rounds is blowing up and has to deal with having arguably the greatest qb of his generation 

Rodgers had a bad game. It impacted all but 2 players on the GB offense. Why can't we complain about the supposed "greatest QB of his generation" having a bad game? 

 

The "greatest" didn't look like the "greatest" last night, and hasn't all season. 

Edited by oliminator123
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, oliminator123 said:

Rodgers had a bad game. It impacted all but 2 players on the GB offense. Why can't we complain about the supposed "greatest QB of his generation" having a bad game? 

 

The "greatest" didn't look like the "greatest" last night, and hasn't all season. 

how would aaron jones statlines look if rodgers had torn his acl against the bears instead of spraining it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Cotton Jones said:

how would aaron jones statlines look if rodgers had torn his acl against the bears instead of spraining it?

We probably wouldve saw all those check downs and had 30 points but adams wouldve had 8 targets for 60 yards lol

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His usage will likely NEVER make him elite. BUT if his efficiency remains high then there's no reason to think he can't be a low end #1 moving forward. Reminds me a lot of Kamara early last year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Fantasy Gooroo said:

Did Rodgers ever advocate for Lacy to get more carries?

 

No. But he did advocate for more cheeseburgers for him. ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He had 20 fantasy points at the half and I thought he would have a monster day. Didnt happen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, pdizzle710 said:

 

No. But he did advocate for more cheeseburgers for him. ?

Lol. Very telling. Could be watching a Star emerge. Don’t own him anywhere but he now has my attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Tommy Lee Jones said:

Zeke has scored 20+ in standard only 2 times this season.  Jones had 20 at halftime.  

So? 

 

Does your league only use first half stats? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree Rodgers missed several open players... then complained at them like their fault when he did throw it... when he's wrong he's right:blink:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, urban2014 said:

He had 20 fantasy points at the half and I thought he would have a monster day. Didnt happen

 

He had a monster day.  His 24.8 half-PPR points would have been RB6 in Week 8, RB8 in Week 9, and RB9 in Week 10.  This will almost certainly be a top-10 finish once everyone else goes.

 

He easily could have had the RB1-overall finish if Rodgers had looked his way more often in the second half, but this game cemented his status as an RB1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I guess I was right to question his usage.  Thankfully he saved our butts with the two TDs.

 

Best thing to me was the increased usage in the passing game.  I don't think any of us really expected that but IMO is huge.  That gives him a safer floor even if McCarthy keeps trying to torpedo Jones/the Packers season.  It also shows Rodgers is really dedicated to keeping him involved.  Plus he showed some decent receiving skills specifically on his TD reception.  It was a long rec by RB standards and he was covered decently but showed great concentration to complete the process.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't be happier with last night's performance. Increased usage in the passing game a pleasant surprise and hope it sticks.

 

That said, it's like McCarthy still doesn't get it. GB had a golden opportunity to open the 2nd half. Continue running the ball, start controlling the game. I don't have the playcalling in front of me, but it sure seemed like Rodgers kept dropping back to pass every time and there were numerous three and outs. 

 

And not one screen pass called.

 

This coach is a dummy. Pure and simple. And next week's MN matchup is going to be tough. Would like A. Jones to be a "must start" no matter what the matchup but I'm not sure he's there understanding the above.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, JJ1223 said:

So I guess I was right to question his usage.  Thankfully he saved our butts with the two TDs.

 

Best thing to me was the increased usage in the passing game.  I don't think any of us really expected that but IMO is huge.  That gives him a safer floor even if McCarthy keeps trying to torpedo Jones/the Packers season.  It also shows Rodgers is really dedicated to keeping him involved.  Plus he showed some decent receiving skills specifically on his TD reception.  It was a long rec by RB standards and he was covered decently but showed great concentration to complete the process.

Strange considering he received all but 2 carries and had 5 receptions- second on the team.  

 

This game answered any questions I had about his usage.   He’s now the 3 down workhorse and rb1 is right there for the taking.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Impreza178 said:

Strange considering he received all but 2 carries and had 5 receptions- second on the team.  

 

This game answered any questions I had about his usage.   He’s now the 3 down workhorse and rb1 is right there for the taking.  

Right, he is absolutely the lead back.  No question there.  My point is that they ran the ball 12 times (not counting Rodgers 1 attempt) in a game that was competitive literally from buzzer to buzzer.  Realistically they should have run the ball 20+ times with Jones getting 15+ of those.  That's the usage I'm concerned with, not him vs. other RBs.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Fantasy Gooroo said:

Did Rodgers ever advocate for Lacy to get more carries?

No, but Lacy was a high draft pick and was never competing with other RBs for touches. His conditioning is what did him in after the first couple seasons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, JJ1223 said:

Right, he is absolutely the lead back.  No question there.  My point is that they ran the ball 12 times (not counting Rodgers 1 attempt) in a game that was competitive literally from buzzer to buzzer.  Realistically they should have run the ball 20+ times with Jones getting 15+ of those.  That's the usage I'm concerned with, not him vs. other RBs.

16 touches though....I’m not going to assume that’s his cap by any means.    Agreed though they should have run the ball more period.    

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Impreza178 said:

Strange considering he received all but 2 carries and had 5 receptions- second on the team.  

 

This game answered any questions I had about his usage.   He’s now the 3 down workhorse and rb1 is right there for the taking.  

Not to nitpick but you can't be considered a workhorse until the team actually leans on you to close out games. He's a 3 down back now.....a step in the right direction. Gurley, Hunt, Conner, Barkley, Gordon, Zeke for example.....those are workhorses. They are entirely script proof

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Joe Odam said:

Not to nitpick but you can't be considered a workhorse until the team actually leans on you to close out games. He's a 3 down back now.....a step in the right direction. Gurley, Hunt, Conner, Barkley, Gordon, Zeke for example.....those are workhorses. They are entirely script proof

 

Disagree-  you’re a 3 down workhorse when you dominate touches in both facets of the offense. That doesn’t make you an elite rb1 or the focal point of the offense late in games necessarily...that is out of his hands.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.