Worthy of a #1 waiver wire claim (WHIR)

[Illuminati 73]

Hey guys,

https://imgur.com/a/vp3S1O3

2 man, .5 PPR, waiver resets the next week in order of claims. 2 adds per week. I have the #1 waiver wire claim this week

FA's I'm considering:

Matthew Stafford, Curtis Samuels, Kenny Stills, Ty Johnson

 What should I do? I'm 3-4 and need the win.

 

Thanks,

[Chargers88 188]

I like Samuel and stills but if you need rb help with bye weeks I would go ty Johnson 

 

 

 

help

 

 

[Illuminati 73]

7 minutes ago, Chargers88 said:

I like Samuel and stills but if you need rb help with bye weeks I would go ty Johnson 

 

 

 

help

 

 

 

Thanks bud

[bookofalamo28 81]

I'd go Ty Johnson too. You don't really need a WR.

 

[mvttchew 428]

I’d also look at Stafford considering he’s the weakest. I don’t think Johnson will be the featured back. McKissic has shown he’s explosive and can move the ball. Patricia just said they’ll employ a RBBC. If you need wins now, I doubt you’d slot him in over your other RBs. 

Help me?

 

[FitzMagic 2,783]

RB in a committee and no clear indication if they'll go after anybody in a trade or on FA market? Hard pass for me.

[youngrice 1,119]

Ty Johnson.  A potential starting RB in a good offense in week 8.  You might not get another shot at one.  You have to take the chance. 

[Illuminati 73]

27 minutes ago, mvttchew said:

I’d also look at Stafford considering he’s the weakest. I don’t think Johnson will be the featured back. McKissic has shown he’s explosive and can move the ball. Patricia just said they’ll employ a RBBC. If you need wins now, I doubt you’d slot him in over your other RBs. 

Help me?

 

 

Yeah I don't think I'd start him over Edmonds as my flex. I need the win this week which makes this so hard as I'd probably start Stafford. Sounds like my decision is between upgrading at QB or RB.

Thanks for all the help boys. I'm so torn.

[Oklahoma 100]

I would add Stafford. Johnson is not needed this week. It's one week at a time at this point.