WHO WOULD U RATHER HAVE ROS FULGHAM OR PITTMAN? WHIR

[Tomei7 557]

Who would u rather have Fulgham or Pittman. WHIR 100%

[errrkk 2]

I like Fulgham 

[d3nali 19]

Fullgham. will be better. Last game was an aberration 

[smokey78 23]

Fulgham. I love Pittman, but I don’t trust Rivers to give him enough targets.

[GuyIncognito 79]

I agree with Fulgham. Thanks for the help with mine.

[gregp 44]

Fulgham

[BaBaBooey 306]

Fulgham but it’s very close. If you’re partial to the colts or just have a gut feeling about Pittman I wouldn’t be scared to go with him instead

 

 

[Rush2112 4,177]

Cheese steaks 

[GoPackGo23 355]

Another vote for Fulgham...I wouldn't want to rely on Indy's passing game.

[bronxboy 8]

Fulgham but its close 

[Tomei7 557]

35 minutes ago, Rush2112 said:

Cheese steaks 

Cheese 🧀 Steaks?

[Tomei7 557]

13 minutes ago, GoPackGo23 said:

Another vote for Fulgham...I wouldn't want to rely on Indy's passing game.

But relying on Wentz and all the mouths to feed has me in question. At least we know Pittman doesn’t really have competition.

[Tomei7 557]

41 minutes ago, BaBaBooey said:

Fulgham but it’s very close. If you’re partial to the colts or just have a gut feeling about Pittman I wouldn’t be scared to go with him instead

 

 

My thoughts on the two is that Fulgham has competition for targets with Reagor, Goedert, Jeffery, and soon to be Ertz and on top of that Wentz is playing horrible where as Pittman really doesn’t have the competition for targets like Fulgham has.

[BaBaBooey 306]

1 minute ago, Tomei7 said:

My thoughts on the two is that Fulgham has competition for targets with Reagor, Goedert, Jeffery, and soon to be Ertz and on top of that Wentz is playing horrible where as Pittman really doesn’t have the competition for targets like Fulgham has.

I think that’s perfectly fair reasoning. Sometimes you gotta go with your gut when it’s close between two guys. Go with Pittman 

[redsox490 62]

Fulgham

[ilikepieman 108]

Fulgham is more reliable at this point. Thanks for mine!

[aliu603 43]

Pittman for me. Too many weapons in Philly now that everyone is healthy, his massive target share will not continue imo. Rivers likes his big bodied receivers and Pittman has performed when called upon. I think Rivers has spread it around because none of his receivers pre-Pittman could play that #1 role but I believe Pittman can.

 

 

[Tomei7 557]

Bump

[Tomei7 557]

On 11/20/2020 at 3:23 PM, errrkk said:

I like Fulgham 

 

On 11/20/2020 at 3:38 PM, d3nali said:

Fullgham. will be better. Last game was an aberration 

 

On 11/20/2020 at 3:39 PM, smokey78 said:

Fulgham. I love Pittman, but I don’t trust Rivers to give him enough targets.

 

On 11/20/2020 at 4:02 PM, GuyIncognito said:

I agree with Fulgham. Thanks for the help with mine.

 

On 11/20/2020 at 4:20 PM, gregp said:

Fulgham

 

On 11/20/2020 at 4:25 PM, BaBaBooey said:

Fulgham but it’s very close. If you’re partial to the colts or just have a gut feeling about Pittman I wouldn’t be scared to go with him instead

 

 

 

On 11/20/2020 at 4:29 PM, Rush2112 said:

Cheese steaks 

 

On 11/20/2020 at 4:52 PM, GoPackGo23 said:

Another vote for Fulgham...I wouldn't want to rely on Indy's passing game.

 

On 11/20/2020 at 5:05 PM, bronxboy said:

Fulgham but its close 

 

On 11/20/2020 at 7:54 PM, redsox490 said:

Fulgham

 

On 11/21/2020 at 11:43 AM, ilikepieman said:

Fulgham is more reliable at this point. Thanks for mine!

 

On 11/21/2020 at 2:57 PM, aliu603 said:

Pittman for me. Too many weapons in Philly now that everyone is healthy, his massive target share will not continue imo. Rivers likes his big bodied receivers and Pittman has performed when called upon. I think Rivers has spread it around because none of his receivers pre-Pittman could play that #1 role but I believe Pittman can.

 

 

Glad I went with my gut and picked up Pittman and dropped Fulgham. Fulgham is a quick fade while Pittman will only get better. Thx fellas for ur input

[gregp 44]

On 11/22/2020 at 6:30 PM, Tomei7 said:

Glad I went with my gut and picked up Pittman and dropped Fulgham. Fulgham is a quick fade while Pittman will only get better. Thx fellas for ur input

Watch fulgham go off Vs that seahawks swiss cheez this wknd.

Not saying it will happen, just possible. I have fulgham and have no idea what do w him.